These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19058009)

  • 1. The role of natural class features in the acquisition of phonotactic regularities.
    Kuo LJ
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2009 Mar; 38(2):129-50. PubMed ID: 19058009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Constraints on statistical computations at 10 months of age: the use of phonological features.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
    Dev Sci; 2015 Nov; 18(6):864-76. PubMed ID: 25530121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonotactic regularities in the segmentation of spoken Italian.
    Tagliapietra L; Fanari R; De Candia C; Tabossi P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):392-415. PubMed ID: 18609378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience.
    Onishi KH; Chambers KE; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2002 Feb; 83(1):B13-23. PubMed ID: 11814489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two for the price of one: Concurrent learning of words and phonotactic regularities from continuous speech.
    Benitez VL; Saffran JR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253039. PubMed ID: 34115799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infants learn phonotactic regularities from brief auditory experience.
    Chambers KE; Onishi KH; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2003 Mar; 87(2):B69-77. PubMed ID: 12590043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deviant neural processing of phonotactic probabilities in adults with dyslexia.
    Noordenbos MW; Segers E; Mitterer H; Serniclaes W; Verhoeven L
    Neuroreport; 2013 Sep; 24(13):746-50. PubMed ID: 23903462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are phonological representations of printed and spoken language isomorphic? Evidence from the restrictions on unattested onsets.
    Berent I
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1288-304. PubMed ID: 18823212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding Bilingual Word Learning: The Role of Phonotactic Probability and Phonological Neighborhood Density.
    Nair VK; Biedermann B; Nickels L
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Dec; 60(12):3551-3560. PubMed ID: 29114764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New phonotactic constraints learned implicitly by producing syllable strings generalize to the production of new syllables.
    Warker JA; Dell GS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1902-10. PubMed ID: 26030628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning phonotactic-like regularities in immediate serial recall.
    Fischer-Baum S; Warker JA; Holloway C
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Jan; 47(1):129-146. PubMed ID: 31928028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contextual variability and exemplar strength in phonotactic learning.
    Denby T; Schecter J; Arn S; Dimov S; Goldrick M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Feb; 44(2):280-294. PubMed ID: 28933893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Phonology, morphology and speech processing development in Greek-speaking children.
    Geronikou E; Vance M; Wells B; Thomson J
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2020 May; 34(5):431-452. PubMed ID: 31284777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Limits on learning phonotactic constraints from recent production experience.
    Warker JA; Dell GS; Whalen CA; Gereg S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1289-95. PubMed ID: 18763905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Learning at a distance II. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies in a non-human primate.
    Newport EL; Hauser MD; Spaepen G; Aslin RN
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 Sep; 49(2):85-117. PubMed ID: 15304368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Listeners learn phonotactic patterns conditioned on suprasegmental cues.
    White KS; Chambers KE; Miller Z; Jethava V
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Dec; 70(12):2560-2576. PubMed ID: 27734753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SyllabO+: A new tool to study sublexical phenomena in spoken Quebec French.
    Bédard P; Audet AM; Drouin P; Roy JP; Rivard J; Tremblay P
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1852-1863. PubMed ID: 27837569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of prior phonotactic knowledge on infant word segmentation: the case of nonadjacent dependencies.
    Gonzalez-Gomez N; Nazzi T
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):840-9. PubMed ID: 23275409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating the retention and time course of phonotactic constraint learning from production experience.
    Warker JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 22686839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. ERP mismatch response to phonological and temporal regularities in speech.
    Emmendorfer AK; Correia JM; Jansma BM; Kotz SA; Bonte M
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9917. PubMed ID: 32555256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.