These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19058050)

  • 1. Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning.
    Eitam B; Schul Y; Hassin RR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 19058050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implicit learning is intact in adult developmental dyslexic readers: evidence from the serial reaction time task and artificial grammar learning.
    Rüsseler J; Gerth I; Münte TF
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2006 Jul; 28(5):808-27. PubMed ID: 16723326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is learned about fragments in artificial grammar learning? A transitional probabilities approach.
    Poletiek FH; Wolters G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):868-76. PubMed ID: 19065286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: the learnability of embedded hierarchical structures.
    de Vries MH; Monaghan P; Knecht S; Zwitserlood P
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 17963740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semantics boosts syntax in artificial grammar learning tasks with recursion.
    Fedor A; Varga M; Szathmáry E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):776-82. PubMed ID: 22268913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual strategies in artificial grammar learning.
    Visser I; Raijmakers ME; Pothos EM
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):293-307. PubMed ID: 19827700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Instruction effects in implicit artificial grammar learning: a preference for grammaticality.
    Forkstam C; Elwér A; Ingvar M; Petersson KM
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1221():80-92. PubMed ID: 18561897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative priming is stronger for task-relevant dimensions: Evidence of flexibility in the selective ignoring of distractor information.
    Frings C; Wentura D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):683-93. PubMed ID: 16707357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The automatic orienting of attention to goal-relevant stimuli.
    Vogt J; De Houwer J; Moors A; Van Damme S; Crombez G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 May; 134(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 20079475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Abstract structural representations of goal-directed behavior.
    Allen K; Ibara S; Seymour A; Cordova N; Botvinick M
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Oct; 21(10):1518-24. PubMed ID: 20855906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations.
    Conway CM; Christiansen MH
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Oct; 17(10):905-12. PubMed ID: 17100792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. More learned irrelevance than perseveration errors in rule shifting in healthy subjects.
    Maes JH; Damen MD; Eling PA
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):201-11. PubMed ID: 15050775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relevance-based selectivity: the case of implicit learning.
    Eitam B; Glicksohn A; Shoval R; Cohen A; Schul Y; Hassin RR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1508-15. PubMed ID: 23937215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Strengthening the case for stimulus-specificity in artificial grammar learning: no evidence for abstract representations with extended exposure.
    Johansson T
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(3):188-97. PubMed ID: 19289361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory expectations for newly acquired structures.
    Tillmann B; Poulin-Charronnat B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1646-64. PubMed ID: 20175025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Transfer in artificial grammar learning: the role of repetition information.
    Lotz A; Kinder A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):707-15. PubMed ID: 16822142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How long does it take to find a cause? An online investigation of implicit causality in sentence production.
    Guerry M; Gimenes M; Caplan D; Rigalleau F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1535-55. PubMed ID: 16873107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities.
    Goschke T; Bolte A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):394-406. PubMed ID: 17352620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.