BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19058105)

  • 1. Research study on neck injury lessening with active head restraint using human body FE model.
    Kitagawa Y; Yasuki T; Hasegawa J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Dec; 9(6):574-82. PubMed ID: 19058105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seat design principles to reduce neck injuries in rear impacts.
    Viano DC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Dec; 9(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 19058102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Energy-absorbing car seat designs for reducing whiplash.
    Himmetoglu S; Acar M; Bouazza-Marouf K; Taylor AJ
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Dec; 9(6):583-91. PubMed ID: 19058106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of head restraint and seat redesign on neck injury risk in rear-end crashes.
    Farmer CM; Wells JK; Lund AK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Jun; 4(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 16210192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concussion in professional football: biomechanics of the struck player--part 14.
    Viano DC; Casson IR; Pellman EJ
    Neurosurgery; 2007 Aug; 61(2):313-27; discussion 327-8. PubMed ID: 17762744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of seatback characteristics on cervical injury risk in severe rear impacts.
    Burnett R; Carter J; Roberts V; Myers B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2004 Jul; 36(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 15094412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Variability in vehicle and dummy responses in rear-end collisions.
    Siegmund GP; Heinrichs BE; Chimich DD; Lawrence J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Sep; 6(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 16087468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical spine curvature during simulated rear crashes with energy-absorbing seat.
    Ivancic PC; Xiao M
    Spine J; 2011 Mar; 11(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 21377605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic kinematic responses of female volunteers in rear impacts and comparison to previous male volunteer tests.
    Carlsson A; Linder A; Davidsson J; Hell W; Schick S; Svensson M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Aug; 12(4):347-57. PubMed ID: 21823943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical human models for accident research and safety - potentials and limitations.
    Praxl N; Adamec J; Muggenthaler H; von Merten K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():201-7. PubMed ID: 18431848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical injury evaluation of laminated side door windows and sunroof during rollover accidents.
    Sances A; Kumaresan S; Carlin F; Friedman K; Meyer S
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2003; 39():241-4. PubMed ID: 12724901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of wheelchair headrest use on pediatric head and neck injury risk outcomes during rear impact.
    Fuhrman SI; Karg PE; Bertocci GE
    Accid Anal Prev; 2008 Jul; 40(4):1595-603. PubMed ID: 18606295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A numerical investigation of factors affecting cervical spine injuries during rollover crashes.
    Hu J; Yang KH; Chou CC; King AI
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2529-35. PubMed ID: 18978594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Incorporation of lower neck shear forces to predict facet joint injury risk in low-speed automotive rear impacts.
    Stemper BD; Storvik SG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2010 Jun; 11(3):300-8. PubMed ID: 20544575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical evaluation of occupant anthropometry during frontal collisions.
    Frieder R; Kumar S; Sances A
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2007; 43():75-80. PubMed ID: 17487060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neck muscle load distribution in lateral, frontal, and rear-end impacts: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Hedenstierna S; Halldin P; Siegmund GP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2626-33. PubMed ID: 19910765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship of dynamic seat ratings to real-world neck injury rates.
    Farmer CM; Zuby DS; Wells JK; Hellinga LA
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Dec; 9(6):561-7. PubMed ID: 19058103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of muscle activation on neck response.
    Brolin K; Halldin P; Leijonhufvud I
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 15823878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of initial seated position in low speed rear-end impacts: a comparison with the TNO rear impact dummy (TRID) model.
    Venkataramana MP; Hans SA; Bawab SY; Keifer OP; Woodhouse ML; Layson PD
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2005 Mar; 6(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 15823879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Load limiting behavior in CRS tether anchors as a method to mitigate head and neck injuries sustained by children in frontal crash.
    Kapoor T; Altenhof W; Tot M; Zhang W; Howard A; Rasico J; Zhu F; Mizuno K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2008; 9(3):243-55. PubMed ID: 18570147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.