These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19060373)

  • 21. The risk of disc prolapses with complex loading in different degrees of disc degeneration - a finite element analysis.
    Schmidt H; Kettler A; Rohlmann A; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):988-98. PubMed ID: 17822814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading.
    Schmidt H; Kettler A; Heuer F; Simon U; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):748-55. PubMed ID: 17414908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. New interspinous implant evaluation using an in vitro biomechanical study combined with a finite-element analysis.
    Lafage V; Gangnet N; Sénégas J; Lavaste F; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(16):1706-13. PubMed ID: 17632390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A constitutive modeling of the human lumbar intervertebral disc and forward-backward bending simulation.
    Tadano S; Katagiri K; Umehara S; Ukai T
    Biomed Mater Eng; 1997; 7(3):179-91. PubMed ID: 9262831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Stress distribution in the intervertebral disc correlates with strength distribution in subdiscal trabecular bone in the porcine lumbar spine.
    Ryan G; Pandit A; Apatsidis D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Aug; 23(7):859-69. PubMed ID: 18423954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Application of a new calibration method for a three-dimensional finite element model of a human lumbar annulus fibrosus.
    Schmidt H; Heuer F; Simon U; Kettler A; Rohlmann A; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 16439042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of an interspinous implant on loads in the lumbar spine.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Burra NK; Bergmann G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Oct; 50(10):343-7. PubMed ID: 16300050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Finite element modeling of lumbar spine and study on its biodynamics].
    Guo L; Liu X; Chen W; Mu E
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 24(5):1084-8. PubMed ID: 18027702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Statistical factorial analysis on the poroelastic material properties sensitivity of the lumbar intervertebral disc under compression, flexion and axial rotation.
    Malandrino A; Planell JA; Lacroix D
    J Biomech; 2009 Dec; 42(16):2780-8. PubMed ID: 19796766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Formulations of polyvinyl alcohol cryogel that mimic the biomechanical properties of soft tissues in the natural lumbar intervertebral disc.
    Wang BH; Campbell G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Dec; 34(25):2745-53. PubMed ID: 19940732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc.
    Denozière G; Ku DN
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(4):766-75. PubMed ID: 16439247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can intervertebral disc prolapse be predicted by disc mechanics?
    McNally DS; Adams MA; Goodship AE
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1525-30. PubMed ID: 8235825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Effect of lumbar discectomy and disc replacement on compressive load in proximal adjacent segment].
    Ge L; Li K; Hu J; Lei G
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2009 Mar; 34(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 19349678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [A new approach to the biomechanics of the normal and pathologic lumbar disk using the finite element method].
    Stan S; Coulon E; Mosora F
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1989; 55(2):97-106. PubMed ID: 2801092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validated finite element analysis of the maverick total disc prosthesis.
    Le Huec JC; Lafage V; Bonnet X; Lavaste F; Josse L; Liu M; Skalli W
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun; 23(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 20068471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of discectomy on the stress distribution in the lumbar spine.
    Dai LY; Tu KY; Xu YK; Zhang WM; Cheng PL
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1992 Nov; 105(11):944-8. PubMed ID: 1304466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical influence of disk properties on the load transfer of healthy and degenerated disks using a poroelastic finite element model.
    Chagnon A; Aubin CE; Villemure I
    J Biomech Eng; 2010 Nov; 132(11):111006. PubMed ID: 21034147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Remedy for fictive negative pressures in biphasic finite element models of the intervertebral disc during unloading.
    Schmidt H; Galbusera F; Wilke HJ; Shirazi-Adl A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Mar; 14(3):293-303. PubMed ID: 21347916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.