These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19060431)

  • 1. [Stereometry of the prostate using MRI-A comparison between TRUS, CT, and MRI-].
    Noda C; Takahashi T; Okabe K; Saito H; Kato K; Nakazawa Y
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Nov; 64(11):1369-74. PubMed ID: 19060431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation Analyses of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Calculation of Prostate Volume in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Voiding Problems Who Cannot Have Transrectal Ultrasonography.
    Kim SH; Park B; Kwon WA; Joung JY; Seo HK; Chung J; Lee KH
    Biomed Res Int; 2019; 2019():7029450. PubMed ID: 31049353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging: is transrectal ultrasound suitable to determine which patients should undergo active surveillance?
    Weiss BE; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB; Guzzo TJ
    Urol Oncol; 2013 Nov; 31(8):1436-40. PubMed ID: 22503576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of prostate volume measured by transrectal ultrasonography and MRI with the actual prostate volume measured after radical prostatectomy.
    Jeong CW; Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee HJ; Lee SE
    Urol Int; 2008; 81(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 18758216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostate volume as compared with radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Lee JS; Chung BH
    Urol Int; 2007; 78(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 17495490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value of computed tomography in calculating prostate volume when transrectal ultrasonography is not applicable.
    Lee YJ; Kim SH; Kim H; Lee JS; Piao S; Oh SJ
    Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2019 Apr; 11(2):O147-O151. PubMed ID: 30010252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Prospective Comparison of Computed Tomography with Transrectal Ultrasonography Assistance and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Target-Volume Definition During Image Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancers.
    Mahantshetty U; Naga Ch P; Khadanga CR; Gudi S; Chopra S; Gurram L; Jamema S; Ghadi Y; Shrivastava S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Dec; 102(5):1448-1456. PubMed ID: 30146092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prostate volume determination: differential volume measurements comparing CT and TRUS.
    Kälkner KM; Kubicek G; Nilsson J; Lundell M; Levitt S; Nilsson S
    Radiother Oncol; 2006 Nov; 81(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 17069912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of transrectal ultrasound prostatic volume estimation with magnetic resonance imaging volume estimation and surgical specimen weight in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.
    Tewari A; Indudhara R; Shinohara K; Schalow E; Woods M; Lee R; Anderson C; Narayan P
    J Clin Ultrasound; 1996 May; 24(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 8727414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasound-CT fusion compared with MR-CT fusion for postimplant dosimetry in permanent prostate brachytherapy.
    Bowes D; Crook JM; Araujo C; Batchelar D
    Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 22727473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of CT scan to transrectal ultrasound-measured prostate volume in untreated prostate cancer.
    Hoffelt SC; Marshall LM; Garzotto M; Hung A; Holland J; Beer TM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Sep; 57(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 12909212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What is the best radiological method to predict the actual weight of the prostate?
    Kiliç M; Ozdemir AT; Altinova S; Atmaca AF; Canda AE; Balbay MD
    Turk J Med Sci; 2014; 44(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 25558555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transrectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in the estimation of prostatic volume.
    al-Rimawi M; Griffiths DJ; Boake RC; Mador DR; Johnson MA
    Br J Urol; 1994 Nov; 74(5):596-600. PubMed ID: 7530124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
    Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
    Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prostate volume measurement by transrectal ultrasound and computed tomography before and after permanent prostate brachytherapy.
    Solhjem MC; Davis BJ; Pisansky TM; Wilson TM; Mynderse LA; Herman MG; King BF; Geyer SM
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 15465193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. MRI-based preplanning in low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
    Tanaka O; Hayashi S; Matsuo M; Nakano M; Kubota Y; Maeda S; Ohtakara K; Deguchi T; Hoshi H
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 17933407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
    Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A survey of prostate segmentation methodologies in ultrasound, magnetic resonance and computed tomography images.
    Ghose S; Oliver A; Martí R; Lladó X; Vilanova JC; Freixenet J; Mitra J; Sidibé D; Meriaudeau F
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2012 Oct; 108(1):262-87. PubMed ID: 22739209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prostate segmentation in transrectal ultrasound using magnetic resonance imaging priors.
    Zeng Q; Samei G; Karimi D; Kesch C; Mahdavi SS; Abolmaesumi P; Salcudean SE
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Jun; 13(6):749-757. PubMed ID: 29589259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiattribute probabilistic prostate elastic registration (MAPPER): application to fusion of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sparks R; Bloch BN; Feleppa E; Barratt D; Moses D; Ponsky L; Madabhushi A
    Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1153-63. PubMed ID: 25735270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.