115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19061104)
1. We cannot accurately predict the extent of an infant's future suffering: the Groningen Protocol is too dangerous to support.
Kon AA
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):27-9. PubMed ID: 19061104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A case against justified non-voluntary active euthanasia (the Groningen Protocol).
Jotkowitz A; Glick S; Gesundheit B
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):23-6. PubMed ID: 19061103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revisiting justified nonvoluntary euthanasia.
Manninen B
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):33-5. PubMed ID: 19061107
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Life, death, and harm: staying within the boundaries of nonmaleficence.
Woien S
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):31-2. PubMed ID: 19061106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A case against something that is not the case: the Groningen Protocol and the moral principle of non-maleficence.
de Vries MC; Verhagen AA
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Nov; 8(11):29-31. PubMed ID: 19061105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Groningen Protocol: what is it, how do the Dutch use it, and do we use it here?
Catlin A; Novakovich R
Pediatr Nurs; 2008; 34(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 18649815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Beyond the threshold of life. Treating and non-treating of critically ill newborns in The Netherlands.
Huibers AK
J Leg Med; 1995 Jun; 16(2):227-45. PubMed ID: 7636404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Groningen protocol: another perspective.
Jotkowitz AB; Glick S
J Med Ethics; 2006 Mar; 32(3):157-8. PubMed ID: 16507660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Still on the same slope: Groningen breaks no new ethical ground.
Hanson SS
Am J Bioeth; 2009 Apr; 9(4):67-8. PubMed ID: 19326322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Groningen Protocol, unfortunately misunderstood. Commentary on Gesundheit et al.: The Groningen Protocol - the Jewish perspective (neonatology 2009;96:6-10).
Sauer PJ; Verhagen AA
Neonatology; 2009; 96(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 19176978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Debate: severely handicapped newborns. For sometimes letting--and helping--die.
Kuhse H; Singer P
Law Med Health Care; 1986 Sep; 14(3-4):149-54. PubMed ID: 2951564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Child abuse by whom? -- Parental rights and judicial competency determinations: the Baby K and Baby Terry cases.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1994; 20(4):821-46. PubMed ID: 11652997
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
Barry RL
Linacre Q; 1985 Nov; 52(4):361-74. PubMed ID: 11651843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Ending the life of a newborn: the Groningen Protocol.
Lindemann H; Verkerk M
Hastings Cent Rep; 2008; 38(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 18314809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reducing suffering and ensuring beneficial outcomes for neonates: an ethical perspective.
Brodeur D
Bioethics Forum; 1995; 11(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 11653274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: ethical considerations.
Reynolds S; Cooper AB; McKneally M
Surg Clin North Am; 2007 Aug; 87(4):919-36, viii. PubMed ID: 17888789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Health care management of children with cognitive and physical disabilities: to treat or not to treat.
Mims J; Crisham P
J Neurosurg Nurs; 1996 Aug; 28(4):238-51. PubMed ID: 11660803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. End-of-life decisions in newborns: an approach from The Netherlands.
Verhagen AA; Sauer PJ
Pediatrics; 2005 Sep; 116(3):736-9. PubMed ID: 16140716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The legacy of Baby Doe: five perspectives.
Ciulla JB
Psychol Today; 1987 Jan; 21(1):70-71, 74-75. PubMed ID: 11658812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Delivery room resuscitation of the high-risk infant: a conflict of rights.
Cooper R
Cathol Lawyer; 1990; 33(4):325-60. PubMed ID: 11659422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
