These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19061630)

  • 1. [Is hyperdivergence a contraindication in the early treatment of Class II malocclusion?].
    Gebeile-Chauty S; Schott AM; Gelas-Dore B; Aknin JJ
    Orthod Fr; 2008 Dec; 79(4):263-72. PubMed ID: 19061630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Interceptive treatment with the DAC appliance: structural analysis].
    Gebeile-Chauty S; Archer JA; Lautrou A; Aknin JJ
    Orthod Fr; 2007 Dec; 78(4):283-94. PubMed ID: 18082118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of 2 comprehensive Class II treatment protocols including the bonded Herbst and headgear appliances: a double-blind study of consecutively treated patients at puberty.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Stahl F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):698.e1-10; discussion 698-9. PubMed ID: 19524823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion.
    Baccetti T; Franchi L; Kim LH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I.
    Cook AH; Sellke TA; BeGole EA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):376-88. PubMed ID: 7942653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of skeletal and dental pattern of Class II division 1 malocclusion with relevance to clinical practice.
    Sidlauskas A; Svalkauskiene V; Sidlauskas M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 16687908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
    Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The orthopedic effect of the Edgewise technic].
    Aknin JJ; Marchetta E
    Orthod Fr; 1992; 63 Pt 2():469-89. PubMed ID: 1341733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treating Class II malocclusion in children. Vertical skeletal effects of high-pull or low-pull headgear during comprehensive orthodontic treatment and retention.
    Antonarakis GS; Kiliaridis S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 25545335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Class II malocclusion correction: an American board of orthodontics case.
    Snyder RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 10511670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonextraction treatment of a high-angle class II malocclusion: a case report.
    Giancotti A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jun; 117(6):721-7. PubMed ID: 10842116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Successful treatment of postpeak stage patients with class II division 1 malocclusion using non-extraction and multiloop edgewise archwire therapy: a report on 16 cases.
    Liu J; Zou L; Zhao ZH; Welburn N; Yang P; Tang T; Li Y
    Int J Oral Sci; 2009 Dec; 1(4):207-16. PubMed ID: 20690424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Early treatment of Class III: a long-term cohort study].
    Gebeile-Chauty S; Perret M; Schott AM; Aknin JJ
    Orthod Fr; 2010 Sep; 81(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 20712980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear.
    Keeling SD; Wheeler TT; King GJ; Garvan CW; Cohen DA; Cabassa S; McGorray SP; Taylor MG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jan; 113(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 9457018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uprighting the mandibular molars stimulates mandibular growth during treatment of class II malocclusion.
    Miyajima K; Yoshimoto J; Murata S; Kanomi R
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(5):340-3. PubMed ID: 9391711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the variable anchorage straightwire technique using Ricketts' growth prediction.
    Parikakis KA; Moberg S; Hellsing E
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Feb; 31(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 18832190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].
    Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Janson G; Pinzan A; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; de Freitas KM
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19395372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.