BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1640 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19061808)

  • 1. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment effects of mini-implants for en-masse retraction of anterior teeth in bialveolar dental protrusion patients: a randomized controlled trial.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Patil S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):18-29.e1. PubMed ID: 18617099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J; Miyazawa K; Tabuchi M; Kawaguchi M; Shibata M; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Randomized clinical trial comparing control of maxillary anchorage with 2 retraction techniques.
    Xu TM; Zhang X; Oh HS; Boyd RL; Korn EL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):544.e1-9; discussion 544-5. PubMed ID: 21055588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative study between conventional en-masse retraction (sliding mechanics) and en-masse retraction using orthodontic micro implant.
    Basha AG; Shantaraj R; Mogegowda SB
    Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 20386216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for en-masse retraction: a preliminary study.
    Kim SH; Hwang YS; Ferreira A; Chung KR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Aug; 136(2):268-76. PubMed ID: 19651358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Noncompliance maxillary molar distalization with the first class appliance: a randomized controlled trial.
    Papadopoulos MA; Melkos AB; Athanasiou AE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):586.e1-586.e13; discussion 586-7. PubMed ID: 20451774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects of mini-implants in Class II division 1 patients.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Nanda R
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):240-7. PubMed ID: 19216590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Torque control in lingual orthodontics with lever arm mechanics: a case report.
    Aravind M; Shivaprakash G; Ramesh GC
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e186-96. PubMed ID: 23646329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
    Hedayati Z; Shomali M
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical evaluation of orthodontic mini-implants as intraoral anchorage for the intrusion of maxillary anterior teeth.
    Saxena R; Kumar PS; Upadhyay M; Naik V
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 21491000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mini-screw implant or transpalatal arch-mediated anchorage reinforcement during canine retraction: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma M; Sharma V; Khanna B
    J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 39(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22773673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
    Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Canine retraction and anchorage loss: self-ligating versus conventional brackets in a randomized split-mouth study.
    da Costa Monini A; Júnior LG; Martins RP; Vianna AP
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):846-52. PubMed ID: 24592906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Apical root resorption in orthodontic patients with en-masse maxillary anterior retraction and intrusion with miniscrews.
    Liou EJ; Chang PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Feb; 137(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 20152676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mini-implants vs fixed functional appliances for treatment of young adult Class II female patients: a prospective clinical trial.
    Upadhyay M; Yadav S; Nagaraj K; Uribe F; Nanda R
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Mar; 82(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 21867432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Molar distalization with a pendulum appliance K-loop combination.
    Acar AG; Gürsoy S; Dinçer M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Aug; 32(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 20231213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 82.