993 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19062157)
1. External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology.
Zigeuner R; Hutterer G; Chromecki T; Imamovic A; Kampel-Kettner K; Rehak P; Langner C; Pummer K
Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 19062157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation of the Mayo Clinic cancer specific survival score in a Japanese series of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Fujii Y; Saito K; Iimura Y; Sakai Y; Koga F; Kawakami S; Kumagai J; Kihara K
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1290-5; discussion 1295-6. PubMed ID: 18707704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Editorial comment on: external validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology.
Blute ML
Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 19062158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Editorial comment on: External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology.
Giannarini G; Autorino R
Eur Urol; 2010 Jan; 57(1):109-10. PubMed ID: 19062156
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. External validation of the Mayo Clinic Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis (SSIGN) score to predict cancer specific survival using a European series of conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Lohse C; Novara G; Pea M; Cavalleri S; Artibani W
J Urol; 2006 Apr; 175(4):1235-9. PubMed ID: 16515968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. External validation of the Leibovich prognosis score for nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma at a single European center applying routine pathology.
Pichler M; Hutterer GC; Chromecki TF; Jesche J; Kampel-Kettner K; Rehak P; Pummer K; Zigeuner R
J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1773-7. PubMed ID: 21944989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The 'Stage, Size, Grade and Necrosis' score is more accurate than the University of California Los Angeles Integrated Staging System for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Ficarra V; Novara G; Galfano A; Brunelli M; Cavalleri S; Martignoni G; Artibani W
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(2):165-70. PubMed ID: 18782313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of venous tumour thrombus consistency (solid vs friable) on cancer-specific survival in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Bertini R; Roscigno M; Freschi M; Strada E; Angiolilli D; Petralia G; Matloob R; Sozzi F; Capitanio U; Da Pozzo LF; Colombo R; Guazzoni G; Cremonini A; Montorsi F; Rigatti P
Eur Urol; 2011 Aug; 60(2):358-65. PubMed ID: 21640483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of pNx/pN0 grouping in a multivariate setting for outcome modeling in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Ward JF; Blute ML; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Weaver AL; Zincke H
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 12050492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in patients with end-stage renal disease exhibits many favourable clinical, pathologic, and outcome features compared with RCC in the general population.
Neuzillet Y; Tillou X; Mathieu R; Long JA; Gigante M; Paparel P; Poissonnier L; Baumert H; Escudier B; Lang H; Rioux-Leclercq N; Bigot P; Bernhard JC; Albiges L; Bastien L; Petit J; Saint F; Bruyere F; Boutin JM; Brichart N; Karam G; Branchereau J; Ferriere JM; Wallerand H; Barbet S; Elkentaoui H; Hubert J; Feuillu B; Theveniaud PE; Villers A; Zini L; Descazeaux A; Roupret M; Barrou B; Fehri K; Lebret T; Tostain J; Terrier JE; Terrier N; Martin L; Dugardin F; Galliot I; Staerman F; Azemar MD; Irani J; Tisserand B; Timsit MO; Sallusto F; Rischmann P; Guy L; Valeri A; Deruelle C; Azzouzi AR; Chautard D; Mejean A; Salomon L; Rigaud J; Pfister C; Soulié M; Kleinclauss F; Badet L; Patard JJ; ;
Eur Urol; 2011 Aug; 60(2):366-73. PubMed ID: 21377780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of macroscopic tumour necrosis to predict survival of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma.
Pflanz S; Brookman-Amissah S; Roigas J; Kendel F; Hoschke B; May M
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2008; 42(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 19031267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Limited prognostic value of tumor necrosis in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Isbarn H; Patard JJ; Lughezzani G; Rioux-Leclercq N; Crépel M; Cindolo L; de la Taille A; Zini L; Villers A; Shariat SF; Bertini R; Karakiewicz PI
Urology; 2010 Jun; 75(6):1378-84. PubMed ID: 19781745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High expression levels of survivin protein independently predict a poor outcome for patients who undergo surgery for clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Parker AS; Kosari F; Lohse CM; Houston Thompson R; Kwon ED; Murphy L; Riehle DL; Blute ML; Leibovich BC; Vasmatzis G; Cheville JC
Cancer; 2006 Jul; 107(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16736510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and external validation of a new outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with nephrectomy based on preoperative serum C-reactive protein and TNM classification: the TNM-C score.
Iimura Y; Saito K; Fujii Y; Kumagai J; Kawakami S; Komai Y; Yonese J; Fukui I; Kihara K
J Urol; 2009 Mar; 181(3):1004-12; discussion 1012. PubMed ID: 19150550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of predictive accuracy of four prognostic models for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: a multicenter European study.
Cindolo L; Patard JJ; Chiodini P; Schips L; Ficarra V; Tostain J; de La Taille A; Altieri V; Lobel B; Zigeuner RE; Artibani W; Guillé F; Abbou CC; Salzano L; Gallo C
Cancer; 2005 Oct; 104(7):1362-71. PubMed ID: 16116599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a postoperative prognostic model consisting of tumor microvascular invasion, size, and grade to predict disease-free and cancer-specific survival of patients with surgically resected renal cell carcinoma.
May M; Brookman-Amissah S; Kendel F; Knoll N; Roigas J; Hoschke B; Miller K; Gilfrich C; Pflanz S; Gralla O
Int J Urol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):616-21. PubMed ID: 19456988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of renal vein and inferior vena cava involvement in renal cell carcinoma.
Wagner B; Patard JJ; Méjean A; Bensalah K; Verhoest G; Zigeuner R; Ficarra V; Tostain J; Mulders P; Chautard D; Descotes JL; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Prayer-Galetti T; Cindolo L; Valéri A; Meyer N; Jacqmin D; Lang H
Eur Urol; 2009 Feb; 55(2):452-9. PubMed ID: 18692951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the current prognostic models for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy in Chinese population: a 15-year single center experience.
Liu Z; Lv J; Ding K; Fu Q; Cao Q; Wang F
Int J Urol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 19087209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pathological prognostic indicators in renal cell carcinoma].
Rey Rey J; León Ramírez D; López García S; Fernández Vázquez P; Benavente Delgado J; Ojea Calvo A
Actas Urol Esp; 2010 Jan; 34(1):71-7. PubMed ID: 20223135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
