155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19062211)
21. Double lacrimal puncta: clinical presentation and potential mechanisms of epiphora.
Satchi K; McNab AA
Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):180-183.e2. PubMed ID: 19875171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MR dacryocystography: comparison with dacryoendoscopy in positional diagnosis of nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
Higashi H; Tamada T; Mizukawa K; Ito K
Radiol Med; 2016 Jul; 121(7):580-7. PubMed ID: 27048401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Long-term results and factors affecting patency after removal of nasolacrimal stents.
Kim JH; Shin JH; Song HY; Kang W; Lim JO; Park SH; Ko GY; Yoon HK; Sung KB
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Jul; 17(7):1125-30. PubMed ID: 16868165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Low-dose helical CT-dacryocystography in nasolacrimal duct obstruction-a prospective study].
Reichel O; Gora F; Dittrich M; Kugler V
HNO; 2019 Aug; 67(8):600-605. PubMed ID: 31053940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Clinical utility of SPECT/CT and CT-dacryocystography-enhanced dacryoscintigraphy in the imaging of lacrimal drainage system obstruction.
Barna S; Garai I; Kukuts K; Gesztelyi R; Toth L; Kemeny-Beke A
Ann Nucl Med; 2019 Oct; 33(10):746-754. PubMed ID: 31313247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lacrimal excretory system concretions: canalicular and lacrimal sac.
Repp DJ; Burkat CN; Lucarelli MJ
Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2230-5. PubMed ID: 19744730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. MR dacryocystography in the evaluation of patients with obstructive epiphora treated by means of interventional radiologic procedures.
Coskun B; Ilgit E; Onal B; Konuk O; Erbas G
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):141-7. PubMed ID: 22173761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Balloon catheter dilatation of common canaliculus stenoses.
Lachmund U; Ammann-Rauch D; Forrer A; Petralli C; Remonda L; Roeren T; Vonmoos F; Wilhelm K
Orbit; 2005 Sep; 24(3):177-83. PubMed ID: 16169803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. MR dacryocystography: comparison with dacryocystography and CT dacryocystography.
Manfrè L; de Maria M; Todaro E; Mangiameli A; Ponte F; Lagalla R
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2000; 21(6):1145-50. PubMed ID: 10871030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lacrimal tract pathology].
Beloglazov VG; Filimonov GP; At'kova EL; Abdurakhmanov GA; Normatova NS
Vestn Oftalmol; 2007; 123(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 17361798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [MRI dacryocystography after applying gadolinium-containing eyedrops].
Wilhelm K; Keller E; Textor J; Walther E; Schüller H; Schild H
Rofo; 1997 Jul; 167(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 9289044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of epiphora by topical contrast-enhanced CT and MR dacryocystography: which one to choose?
Singla A; Ballal S; Guruvaiah N; Ponnatapura J
Acta Radiol; 2023 Mar; 64(3):1056-1061. PubMed ID: 35815704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Basosquamous carcinoma of the lacrimal sac: a case report.
Altan-Yaycioglu R; Bolat F; Akova YA
Orbit; 2007 Dec; 26(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 18097965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Pigmented villonodular synovitis (PVNS) of the knee joint: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using standard and dynamic paramagnetic contrast media. Report of 52 cases surgically and histologically controlled.
Barile A; Sabatini M; Iannessi F; Di Cesare E; Splendiani A; Calvisi V; Masciocchi C
Radiol Med; 2004 Apr; 107(4):356-66. PubMed ID: 15103287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. High-resolution conjunctival contrast-enhanced MRI dacryocystography.
Hoffmann KT; Hosten N; Anders N; Stroszczynski C; Liebig T; Hartmann C; Felix R
Neuroradiology; 1999 Mar; 41(3):208-13. PubMed ID: 10206170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of the Lacrimal Syringing Test in Relation to Dacryocystography and Dacryoendoscopy.
Nakamura J; Kamao T; Mitani A; Mizuki N; Shiraishi A
Clin Ophthalmol; 2023; 17():1277-1285. PubMed ID: 37162802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dynamic MR dacryocystography: a new method for evaluating nasolacrimal duct obstructions.
Takehara Y; Isoda H; Kurihashi K; Isogai S; Kodaira N; Masunaga H; Sugiyama M; Ozawa F; Takeda H; Nozaki A; Sakahara H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Aug; 175(2):469-73. PubMed ID: 10915696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The surgical outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy according to the obstruction levels of lacrimal drainage system.
Choi JC; Jin HR; Moon YE; Kim MS; Oh JK; Kim HA; Choi MY; Shim WS
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 2(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 19784407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cone Beam Computerized Tomography Dacryocystography (CBCT DCG) for the Evaluation of Lacrimal Drainage System Dysfunction.
Karlin JN; Mustak H; Gupta A; Ramos R; Rootman DB
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020; 36(6):549-552. PubMed ID: 32251183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Non-contrast MR dacryocystography for the evaluation of epiphora and recurrent dacryocystitis: A preliminary study.
Cè M; Grimaldi E; Toto-Brocchi M; Martinenghi C; Oliva G; Felisaz PF; Schiavo P; Lunardi G; Cellina M
Neuroradiol J; 2023 Aug; 36(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 36404757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
