155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19062211)
41. Helical computed tomographic dacryocystography with three-dimensional reconstruction: a new view of the lacrimal drainage system.
Freitag SK; Woog JJ; Kousoubris PD; Curtin HD
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Mar; 18(2):121-32. PubMed ID: 11897953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. [Basic study of MR-dacryocystography].
Yoshikawa T; Hirota S; Ohno Y; Matsumoto S; Ichikawa S; Tomita M; Fukuda T; Sako M; Yokogawa S
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1998 Nov; 58(13):758-60. PubMed ID: 9866993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Syringing has limited reliability in differentiating nasolacrimal duct stenosis from functional delay.
Shapira Y; Juniat V; Macri C; Selva D
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2022 Sep; 260(9):3037-3042. PubMed ID: 35460361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Comparison of 3T dacryo-MRI by instillation with dacryo-CT scan for evaluation of epiphora].
Taupin T; Ltaief Boudrigua A; Baggio E; Gensburger M; Pialat JB
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2014 Sep; 37(7):526-34. PubMed ID: 24972894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Tear transit time evaluation using real-time technique for dynamic MR dacryocystography.
Singh S; Dhull A; Selva D; Ali MJ
Orbit; 2021 Feb; 40(1):34-38. PubMed ID: 32126865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Diversity in Lacrimal Pathway Morphology Among Patients with Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.
Nakamura J; Ohno T; Mizuki Y; Takeuchi M; Mizuki N; Matsumura N
Clin Ophthalmol; 2024; 18():1861-1869. PubMed ID: 38948345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Value of ultrasound biomicroscopy in assessment of small masses at medial canthal region.
Chen Q; Ma R; Gan L; Ren H; Yuan Y
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Apr; 257(4):827-834. PubMed ID: 30671657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Nasolacrimal system: evaluation with gadolinium-enhanced MR dacryocystography with a three-dimensional fast spoiled gradient-recalled technique.
Karagülle T; Erden A; Erden I; Zilelioğlu G
Eur Radiol; 2002 Sep; 12(9):2343-8. PubMed ID: 12195493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Dacryocystography using cone beam CT in patients with lacrimal drainage system obstruction.
Tschopp M; Bornstein MM; Sendi P; Jacobs R; Goldblum D
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014; 30(6):486-91. PubMed ID: 24833449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Quantitative lacrimal scintigraphy in the assessment of epiphora.
Jabbour J; Van der Wall H; Katelaris L; Leslie J; Mackey D; Ghabrial R
Clin Nucl Med; 2008 Aug; 33(8):535-41. PubMed ID: 18645371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) dacryocystography for imaging of the nasolacrimal duct system.
Wilhelm KE; Rudorf H; Greschus S; Garbe S; Lüssem M; Lischka T; Schild HH; Gerstner AO
Klin Neuroradiol; 2009 Dec; 19(4):283-91. PubMed ID: 19936571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the lacrimal gland in sickle cell disease.
Buch K; Watanabe M; Elias EJ; Liao JH; Jara H; Nadgir RN; Saito N; Steinberg MH; Sakai O
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):674-80. PubMed ID: 24834886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Topical contrast-enhanced CT and MR dacryocystography: imaging the lacrimal drainage apparatus of healthy volunteers.
Caldemeyer KS; Stockberger SM; Broderick LS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Dec; 171(6):1501-4. PubMed ID: 9843278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Contribution of MRI in the dynamic study of the lacrimal outflow system].
Pariselle J; Froussart F; Sarrazin JL; Bidaux F; Rigal Sastourne JC; May F; Renard JP; Maurin JF
J Fr Ophtalmol; 1999; 22(6):628-34. PubMed ID: 10434194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Interactive navigation-guided ophthalmic plastic surgery: the utility of 3D CT-DCG-guided dacryolocalization in secondary acquired lacrimal duct obstructions.
Ali MJ; Singh S; Naik MN; Kaliki S; Dave TV
Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():127-133. PubMed ID: 28115826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the investigation of epiphora in patients with patent but nonfunctioning lacrimal systems.
Peter NM; Pearson AR
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009; 25(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 19454931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Time-resolved three-dimensional technique for dynamic magnetic resonance dacryocystography.
Sia PI; Curragh D; Patel S; Rajak S; Drivas P; Selva D
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2019 Dec; 47(9):1131-1137. PubMed ID: 31441978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Computed Tomography Versus Dacryocystography for the Evaluation of the Nasolacrimal Duct-A Study With 72 Patients.
Papathanassiou S; Koch T; Suhling MC; Lenarz T; Durisin M; Stolle SRO; Raab P
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 4(4):393-398. PubMed ID: 31453347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Comparison of CT-DCG and dacryoendoscopy in accurately localizing the lacrimal drainage obstructions.
Zhang W; Li L; Zhang L; Ding Y; Liu X; Ali MJ; Xiao C
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2024 Feb; ():11206721241230581. PubMed ID: 38327083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Digital radiology in the study of the lacrimal ducts].
Falaschi F; Signorini G; Pieri L; Perri G; Genovesi Ebert F
Radiol Med; 1988 Jun; 75(6):584-8. PubMed ID: 3387609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
