662 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19062549)
1. [Comparative characteristics of current tonometric methods].
Astakhov IuS; Akopov EL; Potemkin VV
Vestn Oftalmol; 2008; 124(5):11-4. PubMed ID: 19062549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contour tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement.
Kamppeter BA; Jonas JB
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Aug; 140(2):318-20. PubMed ID: 16086958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma.
Regev G; Harris A; Siesky B; Shoshani Y; Egan P; Moss A; Zalish M; WuDunn D; Ehrlich R
J Glaucoma; 2011; 20(5):282-6. PubMed ID: 20577097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between Central Corneal Thickness and Intraocular Pressure Measured by Goldmann Applanation Tonometry or Pascal Dynamic Contour Tonometry.
Katsimpris JM; Theoulakis PE; Vasilopoulos K; Skourtis G; Papadopoulos GE; Petropoulos IK
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Apr; 232(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 25902089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
Sullivan-Mee M; Halverson KD; Qualls C
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and noncontact tonometry in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
Erdurmus M; Totan Y; Hepsen IF; Yagci R
Eye (Lond); 2009 Mar; 23(3):663-8. PubMed ID: 18259205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New ways to measure intraocular pressure.
ElMallah MK; Asrani SG
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 19(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 18301285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Investigation of the biomechanical properties of the cornea in patients with normotensive and primary open-angle glaucoma].
Avetisov SE; Bubnova IA; Antonov AA
Vestn Oftalmol; 2008; 124(5):14-6. PubMed ID: 19062550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after treatment with prostaglandin analog/prostamide.
Ang GS; Wells AP
J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(5):346; author reply 347. PubMed ID: 20543630
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Biomechanical properties of the cornea in primary open-angle glaucoma].
Eremina MV
Vestn Oftalmol; 2008; 124(5):16-9. PubMed ID: 19062551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraocular pressure measurement-comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
Schneider E; Grehn F
J Glaucoma; 2006 Feb; 15(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 16378009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ocular pulse amplitude measurement using pascal dynamic contour tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Katsimpris JM; Theoulakis PE; Papadopoulos GE; Katsimpris A; Lepidas J; Petropoulos IK
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2014 Apr; 231(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 24771168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pascal dynamic contour tonometry versus goldmann applanation tonometry in gas and air-filled eyes after vitrectomy surgery.
Donaldson MJ; Bhatnagar P; Dhrami-Gavazi E; Santos RA; Barile GR; Del Priore LV; Iranmanesh R; Schiff WM; Chang S
Retina; 2009 Apr; 29(4):481-6. PubMed ID: 18936717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring intraocular pressure-adjustments for corneal thickness and new technologies.
Herndon LW
Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Apr; 17(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 16552245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between diurnal variation of intraocular pressure, ocular pulse amplitude and corneal structural properties.
Villas-Bôas FS; Doi LM; Sousa AK; Melo LA
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 19668956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A clinical comparison of dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry.
Yalcinbayir O; Baykara M; Atasoy A; Ozcetin H
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2010; 41(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 20438047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry--a comparative study.
Jóhannesson G; Hallberg P; Eklund A; Lindén C
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 86(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 18093261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of true intraocular pressure: the gap between theory and practical data.
Chihara E
Surv Ophthalmol; 2008; 53(3):203-18. PubMed ID: 18501267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
