92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19062591)
1. [Arthroplasty of the cervical disks using artificial prodisc C(tm) in 54 patients with 2-year follow-up].
Sukhomel P; Byval'tsev VA
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2008; (3):20-4; discussion 25. PubMed ID: 19062591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.
Murrey D; Janssen M; Delamarter R; Goldstein J; Zigler J; Tay B; Darden B
Spine J; 2009 Apr; 9(4):275-86. PubMed ID: 18774751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [ProDisc-C mobile replacement of an intervertebral disc. A prospective mono-centric two-year study].
Stulík J; Kryl J; Sebesta P; Vyskocil T; Krbec M; Trc T
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2008 Aug; 75(4):253-61. PubMed ID: 18760080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Magnetic resonance imaging clarity of the Bryan, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and PCM cervical arthroplasty devices.
Sekhon LH; Duggal N; Lynch JJ; Haid RW; Heller JG; Riew KD; Seex K; Anderson PA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 17413473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Replacement of lumbosacral intervertebral disks using artificial prostheses: surgical tactics and technique].
Konovalov NA; Shevelev IN; Kungurtsev VV; Zelenkov PV; Nazarenko AG
Zh Vopr Neirokhir Im N N Burdenko; 2008; (3):25-30; discussion 30-1. PubMed ID: 19062592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sagittal balance influences range of motion: an in vivo study with the ProDisc-C.
Rabin D; Bertagnoli R; Wharton N; Pickett GE; Duggal N
Spine J; 2009 Feb; 9(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 18619913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Clinical outcomes of single level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective controlled study].
Wang Y; Cai B; Zhang XS; Xiao SH; Wang Z; Lu N; Chai W; Zheng GQ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 18785525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Preliminary clinical outcome of three-level artificial disc replacement with PRESTIGE LP for cervical disc degenerative disease].
Liu H; Shi R; Liu X; Zhao X; Li T; Gong Q; Zeng J; Song Y; Hong Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Dec; 23(12):1413-7. PubMed ID: 20073299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Contrastive analysis of neck axial symptoms after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty or traditional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion].
Cao J; Shen Y; Yang D; Ding W; Meng X; Zhang W; Li Z
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Oct; 22(10):1200-4. PubMed ID: 18979878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ProDisc-L total disc replacement: a comparison of 1-level versus 2-level arthroplasty patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Hannibal M; Thomas DJ; Low J; Hsu KY; Zucherman J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(21):2322-6. PubMed ID: 17906573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cervical disc arthroplasty (Prodisc-C): analysis of 3 to 4- year follow up results].
Hrabálek L; Vaverka M; Houdek M
Rozhl Chir; 2009 Nov; 88(11):634-41. PubMed ID: 20662444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Functional evaluation of the cervical spine after Bryan artificial disc replacement].
Tian W; Liu B; Li Q; Hu L; Li ZY; Yuan Q; Han X
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):338-41. PubMed ID: 18785527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. General considerations for cervical arthroplasty with technique for ProDisc-C.
Chi JH; Ames CP; Tay B
Neurosurg Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 16(4):609-19, vi. PubMed ID: 16326284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Motion preservation and clinical outcome of porous coated motion cervical disk arthroplasty.
Choi D; Petrik V; Fox S; Parkinson J; Timothy J; Gullan R
Neurosurgery; 2012 Jul; 71(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 22314754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior decompression and interbody fusion with BAK/C for cervical disc degenerative disorders.
Wang X; Chen Y; Chen D; Yuan W; Chen X; Zhou X; Xiao J; Ni B; Jia L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):240-5. PubMed ID: 19494742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement.
Mehren C; Suchomel P; Grochulla F; Barsa P; Sourkova P; Hradil J; Korge A; Mayer HM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Nov; 31(24):2802-6. PubMed ID: 17108833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anatomic midline marking during cervical arthroplasty with ProDisc-C: an alternative, simple, and reliable method: technical note.
Barbagallo GM; Corbino LA; Papavero L; Fritzsche E; Albanese V
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):610-4. PubMed ID: 19956036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Degenerative changes of discs and facet joints in lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc II: minimum two-year follow-up.
Park CK; Ryu KS; Jee WH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(16):1755-61. PubMed ID: 18580548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement.
Auerbach JD; Jones KJ; Fras CI; Balderston JR; Rushton SA; Chin KR
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):711-6. PubMed ID: 17983843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
