These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

526 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19062867)

  • 1. Perceptual development of phoneme contrasts: how sensitivity changes along acoustic dimensions that contrast phoneme categories.
    Heeren WF; Schouten ME
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2291-302. PubMed ID: 19062867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptual assimilation and L2 learning: evidence from the perception of Southern British English vowels by native speakers of Greek and Japanese.
    Lengeris A
    Phonetica; 2009; 66(3):169-87. PubMed ID: 19776666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Production of French vowels by American-English learners of French: language experience, consonantal context, and the perception-production relationship.
    Levy ES; Law FF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1290-305. PubMed ID: 20815464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Category and perceptual interference in second-language phoneme learning: an examination of English /w/-/v/ learning by Sinhala, German, and Dutch speakers.
    Iverson P; Ekanayake D; Hamann S; Sennema A; Evans BG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Oct; 34(5):1305-16. PubMed ID: 18823213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learning words' sounds before learning how words sound: 9-month-olds use distinct objects as cues to categorize speech information.
    Yeung HH; Werker JF
    Cognition; 2009 Nov; 113(2):234-43. PubMed ID: 19765698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The perception of Arabic and Japanese short and long vowels by native speakers of Arabic, Japanese, and Persian.
    Tsukada K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):989-98. PubMed ID: 21361455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek.
    Lengeris A; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3757-68. PubMed ID: 21218907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers.
    Iverson P; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):866-77. PubMed ID: 19640051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Listeners retune phoneme categories across languages.
    Reinisch E; Weber A; Mitterer H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Feb; 39(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 22545600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of training on the acoustic phonetic representation of synthetic speech.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC; Fenn K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1445-65. PubMed ID: 18055767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lexical plasticity in early bilinguals does not alter phoneme categories: II. Experimental evidence.
    Sebastián-Gallés N; Vera-Constán F; Larsson JP; Costa A; Deco G
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2343-57. PubMed ID: 18855552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Native dialect matters: perceptual assimilation of Dutch vowels by Czech listeners.
    Chládková K; Podlipský VJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):EL186-92. PubMed ID: 21974490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: a study of Finnish second-language users of English.
    Ylinen S; Uther M; Latvala A; Vepsäläinen S; Iverson P; Akahane-Yamada R; Näätänen R
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1319-32. PubMed ID: 19445609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Individual differences in the acquisition of second language phonology.
    Golestani N; Zatorre RJ
    Brain Lang; 2009; 109(2-3):55-67. PubMed ID: 18295875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Phonetic, phonemic, and phonological factors in cross-language discrimination of phonotactic contrasts.
    Davidson L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):270-82. PubMed ID: 21090904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perceptual assimilation of American English vowels by inexperienced Russian listeners.
    Gilichinskaya YD; Strange W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Aug; 128(2):EL80-5. PubMed ID: 20707419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of word learning on the perception of non-native consonant sequences.
    Davidson L; Shaw J; Adams T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3697-709. PubMed ID: 18247777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-language acoustic similarity predicts perceptual assimilation of Canadian English and Canadian French vowels.
    Escudero P; Vasiliev P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 22088028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Does training on a phonemic contrast absent in the listener's dialect influence word recognition?
    Dufour S; Nguyen N; Frauenfelder UH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):EL43-8. PubMed ID: 20649188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Different brain strategies underlie the categorical perception of foreign and native phonemes.
    Minagawa-Kawai Y; Mori K; Sato Y
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1376-85. PubMed ID: 16197691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.