428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19062868)
1. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
Kjems U; Boldt JB; Pedersen MS; Lunner T; Wang D
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
Roman N; Woodruff J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
Brons I; Houben R; Dreschler WA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
Francart T; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
Jørgensen S; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
Cao S; Li L; Wu X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between speech recognition in noise and sparseness.
Li G; Lutman ME; Wang S; Bleeck S
Int J Audiol; 2012 Feb; 51(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 22107445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
Roman N; Woodruff J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptual learning for speech in noise after application of binary time-frequency masks.
Ahmadi M; Gross VL; Sinex DG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1687-92. PubMed ID: 23464038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of periodic masker interruption on the intelligibility of interrupted speech.
Iyer N; Brungart DS; Simpson BD
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1693. PubMed ID: 17927429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech recognition in noise with active and passive hearing protectors: a comparative study.
Bockstael A; De Coensel B; Botteldooren D; D'Haenens W; Keppler H; Maes L; Philips B; Swinnen F; Bart V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3702-15. PubMed ID: 21682395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
Koning R; Wouters J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise.
Swanepoel R; Oosthuizen DJ; Hanekom JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the division between early and late reflections on intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech.
Li J; Xia R; Fang Q; Li A; Pan J; Yan Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2801-10. PubMed ID: 25994708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Danish hearing in noise test.
Nielsen JB; Dau T
Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Masking effects of speech and music: does the masker's hierarchical structure matter?
Shi LF; Law Y
Int J Audiol; 2010 Apr; 49(4):296-308. PubMed ID: 20151877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
