These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

428 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19062868)

  • 21. Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: dependence on frequency and threshold parameters.
    Sinex DG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2390-6. PubMed ID: 23556604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Acceptable range of speech level in noisy sound fields for young adults and elderly persons.
    Sato H; Morimoto M; Ota R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1411-9. PubMed ID: 21895082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility.
    Dubbelboer F; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3937-46. PubMed ID: 19206818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children.
    Yang W; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb; 125(2):922-33. PubMed ID: 19206869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of speech-intrinsic variations on human and automatic recognition of spoken phonemes.
    Meyer BT; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):388-403. PubMed ID: 21303019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. English sentence recognition in speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native listeners.
    Jin SH; Liu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL391-7. PubMed ID: 23145700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The noise-suppression capacity of the auditory analyzer for interfering speech in one's native and in an unknown language].
    Tatevosian GI
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1994; (2):14-7. PubMed ID: 7855991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development and evaluation of the Mandarin speech signal content on the acceptable noise level test in listeners with normal hearing in mainland China.
    Chen J; Zhang H; Plyler PN; Cao W; Chen J
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):354-60. PubMed ID: 21599613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech enhancement using a generic noise codebook.
    Srinivasan S; Rao Naidu DH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL161-7. PubMed ID: 22894316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adding irrelevant information to the content prime reduces the prime-induced unmasking effect on speech recognition.
    Wu M; Li H; Gao Y; Lei M; Teng X; Wu X; Li L
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):136-43. PubMed ID: 22101022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Speech intelligibility among modulated and spatially distributed noise sources.
    Culling JF; Mansell ER
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2254-61. PubMed ID: 23556593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A computer model of auditory efferent suppression: implications for the recognition of speech in noise.
    Brown GJ; Ferry RT; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):943-54. PubMed ID: 20136217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perceptual integration between target speech and target-speech reflection reduces masking for target-speech recognition in younger adults and older adults.
    Huang Y; Huang Q; Chen X; Qu T; Wu X; Li L
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):51-65. PubMed ID: 18694813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
    Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.