These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

454 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19064381)

  • 1. Postmarketing surveillance for oncology drugs.
    Viale PH; Moore S
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2008 Dec; 12(6):877-86. PubMed ID: 19064381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissemination of information on potentially fatal adverse drug reactions for cancer drugs from 2000 to 2002: first results from the research on adverse drug events and reports project.
    Ladewski LA; Belknap SM; Nebeker JR; Sartor O; Lyons EA; Kuzel TC; Tallman MS; Raisch DW; Auerbach AR; Schumock GT; Kwaan HC; Bennett CL
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Oct; 21(20):3859-66. PubMed ID: 14551305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adverse drug reactions in elderly patients: alternative approaches to postmarket surveillance.
    Noah BA; Brushwood DB
    J Health Law; 2000; 33(3):383-454. PubMed ID: 11184355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adverse drug event surveillance and drug withdrawals in the United States, 1969-2002: the importance of reporting suspected reactions.
    Wysowski DK; Swartz L
    Arch Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 165(12):1363-9. PubMed ID: 15983284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applications for Food and Drug Administration approval to market a new drug; postmarketing reports; reporting information about authorized generic drugs. Direct final rule.
    Food and Drug Administration, HHS
    Fed Regist; 2008 Sep; 73(189):56487-91. PubMed ID: 18985960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Black box" 101: How the Food and Drug Administration evaluates, communicates, and manages drug benefit/risk.
    Murphy S; Roberts R
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2006 Jan; 117(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16387581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Canadian and US drug approval times and safety considerations.
    Rawson NS; Kaitin KI
    Ann Pharmacother; 2003 Oct; 37(10):1403-8. PubMed ID: 14519031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. National adverse drug reaction reporting. 1984-1989.
    Faich GA
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Aug; 151(8):1645-7. PubMed ID: 1872669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pin the tail on the other donkey: allocating and avoiding injury losses after drug or device approval.
    O'Reilly JT
    Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):559-72. PubMed ID: 17915397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pediatric testing of prescription drugs: the Food and Drug Administration's carrot and stick for the pharmaceutical industry.
    Karst KR
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2000; 49():739-72. PubMed ID: 11067732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deterring inefficient pharmaceutical litigation: an economic rationale for the FDA regulatory compliance defense.
    Viscusi WK; Rowland SR; Dorfman HL; Walsh CJ
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1996 Mar; (205):9-52. PubMed ID: 10156421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Importance and challenges of studying marketed drugs: what is a phase IV study? Common clinical research designs, registries, and self-reporting systems.
    Glasser SP; Salas M; Delzell E
    J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Sep; 47(9):1074-86. PubMed ID: 17766697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bolstering the FDA's drug-safety authority.
    Schultz WB
    N Engl J Med; 2007 Nov; 357(22):2217-9. PubMed ID: 18046024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety surveillance in drug development: understanding the process and its implications for nephrology nursing.
    Browar S
    Nephrol Nurs J; 2002 Apr; 29(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 11997949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postmarketing drug dosage changes of 499 FDA-approved new molecular entities, 1980-1999.
    Cross J; Lee H; Westelinck A; Nelson J; Grudzinskas C; Peck C
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002 Sep; 11(6):439-46. PubMed ID: 12426927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Opening Pandora's pillbox: using modern information tools to improve drug safety.
    Gottlieb S
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(4):938-48. PubMed ID: 16012136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The rise and fall of Natrecor for congestive heart failure: implications for drug policy.
    Kesselheim AS; Fischer MA; Avorn J
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(4):1095-102. PubMed ID: 16835191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecularly targeted oncology therapeutics and prolongation of the QT interval.
    Strevel EL; Ing DJ; Siu LL
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Aug; 25(22):3362-71. PubMed ID: 17664484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Withdrawal of cerivastatin revealed a flaw of post-marketing surveillance system in the United States].
    Saito M; Hirata-Koizumi M; Miyake S; Hasegawa R
    Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 2005; (123):41-5. PubMed ID: 16541751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The FDA and drug safety: a proposal for sweeping changes.
    Furberg CD; Levin AA; Gross PA; Shapiro RS; Strom BL
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 Oct; 166(18):1938-42. PubMed ID: 17030825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.