459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19064381)
1. Postmarketing surveillance for oncology drugs.
Viale PH; Moore S
Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2008 Dec; 12(6):877-86. PubMed ID: 19064381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dissemination of information on potentially fatal adverse drug reactions for cancer drugs from 2000 to 2002: first results from the research on adverse drug events and reports project.
Ladewski LA; Belknap SM; Nebeker JR; Sartor O; Lyons EA; Kuzel TC; Tallman MS; Raisch DW; Auerbach AR; Schumock GT; Kwaan HC; Bennett CL
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Oct; 21(20):3859-66. PubMed ID: 14551305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adverse drug reactions in elderly patients: alternative approaches to postmarket surveillance.
Noah BA; Brushwood DB
J Health Law; 2000; 33(3):383-454. PubMed ID: 11184355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adverse drug event surveillance and drug withdrawals in the United States, 1969-2002: the importance of reporting suspected reactions.
Wysowski DK; Swartz L
Arch Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 165(12):1363-9. PubMed ID: 15983284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Applications for Food and Drug Administration approval to market a new drug; postmarketing reports; reporting information about authorized generic drugs. Direct final rule.
Food and Drug Administration, HHS
Fed Regist; 2008 Sep; 73(189):56487-91. PubMed ID: 18985960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. "Black box" 101: How the Food and Drug Administration evaluates, communicates, and manages drug benefit/risk.
Murphy S; Roberts R
J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2006 Jan; 117(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 16387581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Canadian and US drug approval times and safety considerations.
Rawson NS; Kaitin KI
Ann Pharmacother; 2003 Oct; 37(10):1403-8. PubMed ID: 14519031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. National adverse drug reaction reporting. 1984-1989.
Faich GA
Arch Intern Med; 1991 Aug; 151(8):1645-7. PubMed ID: 1872669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pin the tail on the other donkey: allocating and avoiding injury losses after drug or device approval.
O'Reilly JT
Food Drug Law J; 2007; 62(3):559-72. PubMed ID: 17915397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Pediatric testing of prescription drugs: the Food and Drug Administration's carrot and stick for the pharmaceutical industry.
Karst KR
Am Univ Law Rev; 2000; 49():739-72. PubMed ID: 11067732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Deterring inefficient pharmaceutical litigation: an economic rationale for the FDA regulatory compliance defense.
Viscusi WK; Rowland SR; Dorfman HL; Walsh CJ
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1996 Mar; (205):9-52. PubMed ID: 10156421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Importance and challenges of studying marketed drugs: what is a phase IV study? Common clinical research designs, registries, and self-reporting systems.
Glasser SP; Salas M; Delzell E
J Clin Pharmacol; 2007 Sep; 47(9):1074-86. PubMed ID: 17766697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bolstering the FDA's drug-safety authority.
Schultz WB
N Engl J Med; 2007 Nov; 357(22):2217-9. PubMed ID: 18046024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety surveillance in drug development: understanding the process and its implications for nephrology nursing.
Browar S
Nephrol Nurs J; 2002 Apr; 29(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 11997949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Postmarketing drug dosage changes of 499 FDA-approved new molecular entities, 1980-1999.
Cross J; Lee H; Westelinck A; Nelson J; Grudzinskas C; Peck C
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2002 Sep; 11(6):439-46. PubMed ID: 12426927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Opening Pandora's pillbox: using modern information tools to improve drug safety.
Gottlieb S
Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; 24(4):938-48. PubMed ID: 16012136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The rise and fall of Natrecor for congestive heart failure: implications for drug policy.
Kesselheim AS; Fischer MA; Avorn J
Health Aff (Millwood); 2006; 25(4):1095-102. PubMed ID: 16835191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecularly targeted oncology therapeutics and prolongation of the QT interval.
Strevel EL; Ing DJ; Siu LL
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Aug; 25(22):3362-71. PubMed ID: 17664484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Withdrawal of cerivastatin revealed a flaw of post-marketing surveillance system in the United States].
Saito M; Hirata-Koizumi M; Miyake S; Hasegawa R
Kokuritsu Iyakuhin Shokuhin Eisei Kenkyusho Hokoku; 2005; (123):41-5. PubMed ID: 16541751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The FDA and drug safety: a proposal for sweeping changes.
Furberg CD; Levin AA; Gross PA; Shapiro RS; Strom BL
Arch Intern Med; 2006 Oct; 166(18):1938-42. PubMed ID: 17030825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
