120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19064444)
1. Risk and safety assessment in child welfare: instrument comparisons.
D'Andrade A; Austin MJ; Benton A
J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):31-56. PubMed ID: 19064444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding and addressing racial/ethnic disproportionality in the front end of the child welfare system.
Osterling KL; D'Andrade A; Austin MJ
J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):9-30. PubMed ID: 19064443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Family assessment in child welfare services: instrument comparisons.
Johnson M; Stone S; Lou C; Vu CM; Ling J; Mizrahi P; Austin MJ
J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):57-90. PubMed ID: 19064445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The empirical basis of risk assessment in child welfare: the accuracy of risk assessment and clinical judgment.
Leschied AW; Chiodo D; Whitehead PC; Hurley D; Marshall L
Child Welfare; 2003; 82(5):527-40. PubMed ID: 14524424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the safety of children at risk of maltreatment: decision-making models.
DePanfilis D; Scannapieco M
Child Welfare; 1994; 73(3):229-45. PubMed ID: 8005017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing child and youth well-being: implications for child welfare practice.
Lou C; Anthony EK; Stone S; Vu CM; Austin MJ
J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):91-133. PubMed ID: 19064446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk assessment in child protective services: consensus and actuarial model reliability.
Baird C; Wagner D; Healy T; Johnson K
Child Welfare; 1999; 78(6):723-48. PubMed ID: 10627988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The validity and utility of the California Family Risk Assessment under practice conditions in the field: A prospective study.
Johnson WL
Child Abuse Negl; 2011 Jan; 35(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 21316761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Judges', caseworkers', and substance abuse counselors' indicators of family reunification with substance-affected parents.
Karoll BR; Poertner J
Child Welfare; 2002; 81(2):249-69. PubMed ID: 12014468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding and measuring child welfare outcomes.
D'Andrade A; Osterling KL; Austin MJ
J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):135-56. PubMed ID: 19064447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.
Flynn MA; McNeil DA; Maloff B; Mutasingwa D; Wu M; Ford C; Tough SC
Obes Rev; 2006 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():7-66. PubMed ID: 16371076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety and risk assessment frameworks: overview and implications for child maltreatment fatalities.
Pecora PJ; Chahine Z; Graham JC
Child Welfare; 2013; 92(2):143-60. PubMed ID: 24199327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring the potential for child maltreatment: the reliability and validity of the Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory--2.
Conners NA; Whiteside-Mansell L; Deere D; Ledet T; Edwards MC
Child Abuse Negl; 2006 Jan; 30(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 16406026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Actuarial assessment of violence risk in hospital-based partner assault clinics.
Hilton NZ; Harris GT; Holder N
Can J Nurs Res; 2008 Dec; 40(4):56-70. PubMed ID: 19186785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Substance abuse interventions for parents involved in the child welfare system: evidence and implications.
Osterling KL; Austin MJ
J Evid Based Soc Work; 2008; 5(1-2):157-89. PubMed ID: 19064448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Decision-making in child protective services: a comparison of selected risk-assessment systems.
Doueck HJ; English DJ; DePanfilis D; Moote GT
Child Welfare; 1993; 72(5):441-52. PubMed ID: 8404248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating intensive family preservation programs: a methodological review.
Heneghan AM; Horwitz SM; Leventhal JM
Pediatrics; 1996 Apr; 97(4):535-42. PubMed ID: 8632942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk assessment with actuarial and clinical methods: Measurement and evidence-based practice.
Mendoza NS; Rose RA; Geiger JM; Cash SJ
Child Abuse Negl; 2016 Nov; 61():1-12. PubMed ID: 27676588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Child welfare services and delinquency: the need to know more.
Jonson-Reid M
Child Welfare; 2004; 83(2):157-73. PubMed ID: 15068217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Placement decisions and disparities among aboriginal groups: an application of the decision making ecology through multi-level analysis.
Fluke JD; Chabot M; Fallon B; MacLaurin B; Blackstock C
Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Jan; 34(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 20056276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
