These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19064460)

  • 1. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in infants at dual risk for motor delays.
    Snyder P; Eason JM; Philibert D; Ridgway A; McCaughey T
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2008; 28(3):267-82. PubMed ID: 19064460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a Chinese Version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale Administered to High-Risk Infants in China.
    Wang H; Li H; Wang J; Jin H
    Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():2197163. PubMed ID: 30009165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of gross motor skills of at-risk infants: predictive validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale.
    Darrah J; Piper M; Watt MJ
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 1998 Jul; 40(7):485-91. PubMed ID: 9698062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability and validity of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-second edition for assessing motor development of low birth weight preterm infants.
    Tavasoli A; Azimi P; Montazari A
    Pediatr Neurol; 2014 Oct; 51(4):522-6. PubMed ID: 25266615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent and predictive validities of the Bayley Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales.
    Palisano RJ
    Phys Ther; 1986 Nov; 66(11):1714-9. PubMed ID: 2430308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting motor outcome at preschool age for infants tested at 7, 30, 60, and 90 days after term age using the Test of Infant Motor Performance.
    Kolobe TH; Bulanda M; Susman L
    Phys Ther; 2004 Dec; 84(12):1144-56. PubMed ID: 15563255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Concurrent Validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 at 18 Months.
    Gill K; Osiovich A; Synnes A; A Agnew J; Grunau RE; Miller SP; Zwicker JG
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2019; 39(5):514-524. PubMed ID: 30541412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) to detect developmental delay of gross motor skills in preterm infants: a systematic review.
    de Albuquerque PL; Lemos A; Guerra MQ; Eickmann SH
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2015 Feb; 18(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 25279804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Concurrent validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales in two-year-old children.
    Provost B; Crowe TK; McClain C
    Phys Occup Ther Pediatr; 2000; 20(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 11293915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Concurrent validity between instruments of assessment of motor development in infants exposed to HIV.
    Siegle CBH; Dos Santos Cardoso de Sá C
    Infant Behav Dev; 2018 Feb; 50():198-206. PubMed ID: 29407429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Concurrent validity of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development II (BSID-II) Motor Scale and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale II (PDMS-2) in 12-month-old infants.
    Connolly BH; Dalton L; Smith JB; Lamberth NG; McCay B; Murphy W
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2006; 18(3):190-6. PubMed ID: 16912639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Concurrent validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale to detect delayed gross motor development in preterm infants: A comparative study with the Bayley III.
    Albuquerque PL; Guerra MQF; Lima MC; Eickmann SH
    Dev Neurorehabil; 2018 Aug; 21(6):408-414. PubMed ID: 28537470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alberta infant motor scale: reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan.
    Jeng SF; Yau KI; Chen LC; Hsiao SF
    Phys Ther; 2000 Feb; 80(2):168-78. PubMed ID: 10654063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales - Second Edition (PDMS-2): Reliability, content and construct validity evidence for Brazilian children.
    Zanella LW; Valentini NC; Copetti F; Nobre GC
    Res Dev Disabil; 2021 Apr; 111():103871. PubMed ID: 33571789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent validity of the Bayley-III and the Peabody Developmental Motor Scale-2.
    Connolly BH; McClune NO; Gatlin R
    Pediatr Phys Ther; 2012; 24(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 22965209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Concurrent validity and reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in premature infants.
    Almeida KM; Dutra MV; Mello RR; Reis AB; Martins PS
    J Pediatr (Rio J); 2008; 84(5):442-8. PubMed ID: 18923790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Griffiths-II and Bayley-II tests for the developmental assessment of high-risk infants.
    Cirelli I; Bickle Graz M; Tolsa JF
    Infant Behav Dev; 2015 Nov; 41():17-25. PubMed ID: 26276119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative validity between the Canadian and the Dutch norms of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in a preterm population.
    Gautier C; Alexandre M; Zaczek S; Mostaert A; Legros L
    Child Care Health Dev; 2023 Jan; 49(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 35297080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reference curves for the Brazilian Alberta Infant Motor Scale: percentiles for clinical description and follow-up over time.
    Saccani R; Valentini NC
    J Pediatr (Rio J); 2012; 88(1):40-7. PubMed ID: 22057554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brazilian validation of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale.
    Valentini NC; Saccani R
    Phys Ther; 2012 Mar; 92(3):440-7. PubMed ID: 22135706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.