These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities. Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Võ ML; Henderson JM J Vis; 2009 Mar; 9(3):24.1-15. PubMed ID: 19757963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the flexibility of grammatical advance planning during sentence production: Effects of cognitive load on multiple lexical access. Wagner V; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):423-40. PubMed ID: 20192540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. Han SW; Kim MS J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1292-302. PubMed ID: 19803637 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prioritization of new objects in real-world scenes: evidence from eye movements. Brockmole JR; Henderson JM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 16262483 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Huettig F; Altmann GT Cognition; 2005 May; 96(1):B23-32. PubMed ID: 15833303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concurrent working memory load can facilitate selective attention: evidence for specialized load. Park S; Kim MS; Chun MM J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Oct; 33(5):1062-75. PubMed ID: 17924807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiple interference effects in short-term recognition memory. Bartha MC; Martin RC; Jensen CR Am J Psychol; 1998; 111(1):89-118. PubMed ID: 9624705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Olivers CN J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1275-91. PubMed ID: 19803636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Object knowledge during entry-level categorization is activated and modified by implicit memory after 200 ms. Schendan HE; Maher SM Neuroimage; 2009 Feb; 44(4):1423-38. PubMed ID: 19010426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sources of top-down control in visual search. Weidner R; Krummenacher J; Reimann B; Müller HJ; Fink GR J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2100-13. PubMed ID: 19199412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Dependence of plasticity of set to emotional facial expression on working memory load]. Kostandov EA; Kurova NS; Cheremushkin EA; Petrenko NE; Ashkinazi ML; Iakovenko IA Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 2008; 58(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 18661778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]