BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19064592)

  • 1. Enhancement and safety of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing abdominal multidetector CT.
    Romano L; Grazioli L; Bonomo L; Xu JR; Chen KM; Dore R; Vanzulli A; Catalano C
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 82(975):204-11. PubMed ID: 19064592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography.
    Sahani DV; Soulez G; Chen KM; Lepanto L; Xu JR; Nelson RC; Grazioli L; Vanzulli A; Heiken JP;
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The ACTIVE Trial: comparison of the effects on renal function of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing abdominal computed tomography.
    Thomsen HS; Morcos SK; Erley CM; Grazioli L; Bonomo L; Ni Z; Romano L;
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Mar; 43(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 18301313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MDCT angiography for detection of pulmonary emboli: comparison between equi-iodine doses of iomeprol 400 mgI/mL and iodixanol 320 mgI/mL.
    Langenberger H; Friedrich K; Plank C; Matzek W; Wolf F; Storto ML; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold C
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):579-88. PubMed ID: 18384995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection.
    Schmid I; Didier D; Pfammatter T; Garachemani A; Fleisch M; Kirchin MA; Meier B
    Int J Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 118(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 17376548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Multicenter comparison of high concentration contrast agent iomeprol-400 with iso-osmolar iodixanol-320: contrast enhancement and heart rate variation in coronary dual-source computed tomographic angiography.
    Becker CR; Vanzulli A; Fink C; de Faveri D; Fedeli S; Dore R; Biondetti P; Kuettner A; Krix M; Ascenti G
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):457-64. PubMed ID: 21577124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hepatic contrast medium enhancement at computed tomography and its correlation with various body size measures.
    Svensson A; Nouhad J; Cederlund K; Aspelin P; Nyman U; Björk J; Torkel BB
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Jul; 53(6):601-6. PubMed ID: 22761344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronary stent evaluation with coronary computed tomographic angiography: comparison between low-osmolar, high-iodine concentration iomeprol-400 and iso-osmolar, lower-iodine concentration iodixanol-320.
    Andreini D; Pontone G; Mushtaq S; Bartorelli AL; Conte E; Bertella E; Baggiano A; Annoni A; Formenti A; Ballerini G; Agostoni P; Fiorentini C; Pepi M
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 24582042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing computed tomography: a double-blind comparison of iodixanol and iopamidol.
    Barrett BJ; Katzberg RW; Thomsen HS; Chen N; Sahani D; Soulez G; Heiken JP; Lepanto L; Ni ZH; Ni ZH; Nelson R
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):815-21. PubMed ID: 17035872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Effect of contrast material pushed with saline solution using dual injection on enhancement of aorta, portal vein, and liver parenchyma in multislice CT of the liver].
    Tatsugami F; Matsuki M; Kani H; Miyao M; Yoshikawa S; Narabayashi I
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Sep; 63(8):409-11. PubMed ID: 14587411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of a low-osmolar contrast medium, iopamidol, and an iso-osmolar contrast medium, iodixanol, in MDCT coronary angiography.
    Ozbulbul NI; Yurdakul M; Tola M
    Coron Artery Dis; 2010 Nov; 21(7):414-9. PubMed ID: 20671550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. High-concentration contrast media in multiphasic abdominal multidetector-row computed tomography: effect of increased iodine flow rate on parenchymal and vascular enhancement.
    Schoellnast H; Brader P; Oberdabernig B; Pisail B; Deutschmann HA; Fritz GA; Schaffler G; Tillich M
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(5):582-7. PubMed ID: 16163023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High concentration (400 mgI/mL) versus low concentration (320 mgI/mL) iodinated contrast media in multi detector computed tomography of the liver: a randomized, single centre, non-inferiority study.
    Rengo M; Caruso D; De Cecco CN; Lucchesi P; Bellini D; Maceroni MM; Ferrari R; Paolantonio P; Iafrate F; Carbone I; Vecchietti F; Laghi A
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3096-101. PubMed ID: 22683195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-detector row helical CT of the liver: quantitative assessment of iodine concentration of intravenous contrast material on multiphasic CT--a prospective randomized study.
    Tsurusaki M; Sugimoto K; Fujii M; Sugimura K
    Radiat Med; 2004; 22(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 15468944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of iodine concentration of contrast media on contrast enhancement in multislice CT of the pancreas.
    Fenchel S; Fleiter TR; Aschoff AJ; van Gessel R; Brambs HJ; Merkle EM
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Oct; 77(922):821-30. PubMed ID: 15482993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multi-detector row CT: effect of iodine dose reduction on hepatic and vascular enhancement.
    Roos JE; Desbiolles LM; Weishaupt D; Wildermuth S; Hilfiker PR; Marincek B; Boehm T
    Rofo; 2004 Apr; 176(4):556-63. PubMed ID: 15088181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Iomeprol versus iopamidol in contrast-enhanced computed tomography of thoracic and abdominal organs.
    Valentini AL; Tartaglione T; Monti L; Marano P
    Eur J Radiol; 1994 May; 18 Suppl 1():S88-92. PubMed ID: 8020525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aortic and hepatic contrast enhancement with abdominal 64-MDCT in pediatric patients: effect of body weight and iodine dose.
    Bae KT; Shah AJ; Shang SS; Wang JH; Chang S; Kanematsu M; Hildebolt CF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1589-94. PubMed ID: 18941106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of enhancement and image quality: different iodine concentrations for liver on 128-slice multidetector computed tomography in the same chronic liver disease patients.
    Jo BG; Song YG; Shim SG; Kim YW
    Korean J Intern Med; 2016 May; 31(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 26701234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Cirrhotic Liver Enhancement With Multiphasic Computed Tomography Using a Faster Injection Rate, Late Arterial Phase, and Weight-Based Contrast Dosing.
    Eddy K; Costa AF
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2017 Nov; 68(4):371-378. PubMed ID: 28720415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.