BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19065286)

  • 1. What is learned about fragments in artificial grammar learning? A transitional probabilities approach.
    Poletiek FH; Wolters G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):868-76. PubMed ID: 19065286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical learning within and between modalities: pitting abstract against stimulus-specific representations.
    Conway CM; Christiansen MH
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Oct; 17(10):905-12. PubMed ID: 17100792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Goal relevance and artificial grammar learning.
    Eitam B; Schul Y; Hassin RR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):228-38. PubMed ID: 19058050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The impact of attention load on the use of statistical information and coarticulation as speech segmentation cues.
    Fernandes T; Kolinsky R; Ventura P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1522-32. PubMed ID: 20675798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual strategies in artificial grammar learning.
    Visser I; Raijmakers ME; Pothos EM
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(3):293-307. PubMed ID: 19827700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Semantics boosts syntax in artificial grammar learning tasks with recursion.
    Fedor A; Varga M; Szathmáry E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):776-82. PubMed ID: 22268913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tracking the transition from sublexical to lexical processing: on the creation of orthographic and phonological lexical representations.
    Maloney E; Risko EF; O'Malley S; Besner D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 May; 62(5):858-67. PubMed ID: 19107643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit learning of semantic category sequences: response-independent acquisition of abstract sequential regularities.
    Goschke T; Bolte A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):394-406. PubMed ID: 17352620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stimulus set size and statistical coverage of the grammar in artificial grammar learning.
    Poletiek FH; van Schijndel TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Dec; 16(6):1058-64. PubMed ID: 19966255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Revisiting evidence for modularity and functional equivalence across verbal and spatial domains in memory.
    Guérard K; Tremblay S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):556-69. PubMed ID: 18444756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Applying an exemplar model to the artificial-grammar task: inferring grammaticality from similarity.
    Jamieson RK; Mewhort DJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Mar; 62(3):550-75. PubMed ID: 18609412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implicit learning and reading: insights from typical children and children with developmental dyslexia using the artificial grammar learning (AGL) paradigm.
    Pavlidou EV; Williams JM
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Jul; 35(7):1457-72. PubMed ID: 24751907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The formation of structurally relevant units in artificial grammar learning.
    Perruchet P; Vinter A; Pacteau C; Gallego J
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2002 Apr; 55(2):485-503. PubMed ID: 12047055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential verbal, visual, and spatial working memory in written language production.
    Raulerson BA; Donovan MJ; Whiteford AP; Kellogg RT
    Percept Mot Skills; 2010 Feb; 110(1):229-44. PubMed ID: 20391888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Syntactic structure and artificial grammar learning: the learnability of embedded hierarchical structures.
    de Vries MH; Monaghan P; Knecht S; Zwitserlood P
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):763-74. PubMed ID: 17963740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rapid learning of syllable classes from a perceptually continuous speech stream.
    Endress AD; Bonatti LL
    Cognition; 2007 Nov; 105(2):247-99. PubMed ID: 17083927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On rejecting emotional lures created by phonological neighborhood activation.
    Starns JJ; Cook GI; Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):847-53. PubMed ID: 16822152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling distributions of immediate memory effects: no strategies needed?
    Beaman CP; Neath I; Surprenant AM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):219-29. PubMed ID: 18194064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learned predictiveness effects in humans: a function of learning, performance, or both?
    Le Pelley ME; Suret MB; Beesley T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):312-27. PubMed ID: 19594278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
    Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.