These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19065286)

  • 41. Artificial grammar learning in pigeons.
    Herbranson WT; Shimp CP
    Learn Behav; 2008 May; 36(2):116-37. PubMed ID: 18543712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Reactivation of phonetic and semantic schemes in memorization].
    Lieury A
    Annee Psychol; 1971; 71(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 5559464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A hybrid-similarity exemplar model for predicting distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.
    Nosofsky RM; Zaki SR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Nov; 29(6):1194-209. PubMed ID: 14622055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Tracking the implicit acquisition of nonadjacent transitional probabilities by ERPs.
    Kóbor A; Horváth K; Kardos Z; Takács Á; Janacsek K; Csépe V; Nemeth D
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1546-1566. PubMed ID: 31236822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Role of Simple Semantics in the Process of Artificial Grammar Learning.
    Öttl B; Jäger G; Kaup B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1285-1308. PubMed ID: 28484966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Modeling the effects of repetitions, similarity, and normative word frequency on old-new recognition and judgments of frequency.
    Malmberg KJ; Holden JE; Shiffren RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Mar; 30(2):319-31. PubMed ID: 14979807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Repetition blindness: out of sight or out of mind?
    Morris AL; Harris CL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Oct; 30(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 15462629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Domain-specific learning of grammatical structure in musical and phonological sequences.
    Bly BM; Carrión RE; Rasch B
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 19103971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Direction of report in spatial and verbal serial short-term memory.
    Farrand P; Jones D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Feb; 49(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 8920100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Serial and free recall in children can be improved by training: evidence for the importance of phonological and semantic representations in immediate memory tasks.
    Melby-Lervåg M; Hulme C
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1694-700. PubMed ID: 20921571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Splitting the variance of statistical learning performance: A parametric investigation of exposure duration and transitional probabilities.
    Bogaerts L; Siegelman N; Frost R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):1250-6. PubMed ID: 26743060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The extraction and integration framework: a two-process account of statistical learning.
    Thiessen ED; Kronstein AT; Hufnagle DG
    Psychol Bull; 2013 Jul; 139(4):792-814. PubMed ID: 23231530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Role of selective attention in artificial grammar learning.
    Tanaka D; Kiyokawa S; Yamada A; Dienes Z; Shigemasu K
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Dec; 15(6):1154-9. PubMed ID: 19001583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Subjective measures of awareness and implicit cognition.
    Tunney RJ; Shanks DR
    Mem Cognit; 2003 Oct; 31(7):1060-71. PubMed ID: 14704021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Artificial grammar learning in individuals with severe aphasia.
    Zimmerer VC; Cowell PE; Varley RA
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():25-38. PubMed ID: 24184437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Rapid communication: Sex differences in artificial grammar learning: evidence for different strategies in men and women.
    Lotz A; Kinder A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):417-24. PubMed ID: 21347992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Statistical learning is constrained to less abstract patterns in complex sensory input (but not the least).
    Emberson LL; Rubinstein DY
    Cognition; 2016 Aug; 153():63-78. PubMed ID: 27139779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Individual behavior in learning of an artificial grammar.
    Zimmerer VC; Cowell PE; Varley RA
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):491-501. PubMed ID: 21264600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effects of word frequency and similarity on recognition judgments: the role of recollection.
    Park H; Reder LM; Dickison D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):568-78. PubMed ID: 15910138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition.
    Shiffrin RM; Huber DE; Marinelli K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Mar; 21(2):267-87. PubMed ID: 7738500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.