209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19065363)
1. Comparison of Dinoprostone slow release pessary (Propess) with gel (Prostin) for induction of labour at term-a randomised trial.
Kalkat RK; McMillan E; Cooper H; Palmer K
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 28(7):695-9. PubMed ID: 19065363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is propess a better method of induction of labour in nulliparous women.
Mukhopadhyay M; Lim KJ; Fairlie FM
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 May; 22(3):294-5. PubMed ID: 12521503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induction of labour at term with vaginal prostaglandins preparations: a randomised controlled trial of Prostin vs Propess.
El-Shawarby SA; Connell RJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Oct; 26(7):627-30. PubMed ID: 17071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2).
Kho EM; Sadler L; McCowan L
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Oct; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 19032662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term.
Gregson S; Waterstone M; Norman I; Murrells T
BJOG; 2005 Apr; 112(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 15777441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix].
Grignaffini A; Soncini E; Anfuso S; Ronzoni E
Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Oct; 56(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 15531859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4.
Triglia MT; Palamara F; Lojacono A; Prefumo F; Frusca T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010 May; 89(5):651-7. PubMed ID: 20199360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone Propess for labor induction].
Mazouni C; Provensal M; Ménard JP; Heckenroth H; Guidicelli B; Gamerre M; Bretelle F
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Jun; 34(6):489-92. PubMed ID: 16713322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
Hassan AA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial.
Facchinetti F; Venturini P; Verocchi G; Volpe A
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Apr; 119(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15808378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is expensive always better? Comparison of two induction agents for term rupture of membranes.
Parisaei M; Erskine KJ
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Apr; 28(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18569470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Tan PC; Valiapan SD; Tay PY; Omar SZ
BJOG; 2007 Jul; 114(7):824-32. PubMed ID: 17506788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Propess versus prostin for induction of labour in term primiparous women.
Hung CH; Chen HY; Kang J; Tai YY; Lin SY; Lee CN
J Formos Med Assoc; 2023 Aug; 122(8):785-789. PubMed ID: 36907791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel versus tablet in the induction of labour at term--a retrospective analysis.
Shetty A; Livingston I; Acharya S; Templeton A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Apr; 24(3):243-6. PubMed ID: 15203616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of Propess outcomes for cervical ripening and induction of labour in full-term pregnancy.
Chen W; Zhou Y; Pu X; Xiao C
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Apr; 34(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 24313636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
