These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19066483)

  • 1. Planning for the worst in Washington State: initial response planning for improvised nuclear device explosions.
    Poeton RW; Glines WM; McBaugh D
    Health Phys; 2009 Jan; 96(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 19066483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analyzing evacuation versus shelter-in-place strategies after a terrorist nuclear detonation.
    Wein LM; Choi Y; Denuit S
    Risk Anal; 2010 Sep; 30(9):1315-27. PubMed ID: 20840487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Organization of the nuclear emergency plan].
    Van Bladel L; Vandecasteele C
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2005; 67(5-6):337-40. PubMed ID: 16408829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of dicentric analysis in an overarching biodosimetry strategy for use following a nuclear detonation in an urban environment.
    Blumenthal DJ; Sugarman SL; Christensen DM; Wiley AL; Livingston GK; Glassman ES; Koerner JF; Sullivan JM; Hinds S
    Health Phys; 2014 Apr; 106(4):516-22. PubMed ID: 24562072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Realistic radiological dispersal device hazard boundaries and ramifications for early consequence management decisions.
    Harper FT; Musolino SV; Wente WB
    Health Phys; 2007 Jul; 93(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 17563488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The roles of medical health physicists in a medical radiation emergency.
    Miller CW; Whitcomb RC; Ansari A; McCurley C; Guinn A; Tucker F
    Health Phys; 2007 Nov; 93(5 Suppl):S187-90. PubMed ID: 18049249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting emergency evacuation and sheltering behavior: a structured analytical approach.
    Dombroski M; Fischhoff B; Fischbeck P
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1675-88. PubMed ID: 17184405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiological dispersion devices: are we prepared?
    Sohier A; Hardeman F
    J Environ Radioact; 2006; 85(2-3):171-81. PubMed ID: 16111791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of realistic RDD scenarios and their radiological consequence analyses.
    Shin H; Kim J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2009; 67(7-8):1516-20. PubMed ID: 19318261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planning for protective action decision making: evacuate or shelter-in-place.
    Sorensen JH; Shumpert BL; Vogt BM
    J Hazard Mater; 2004 Jun; 109(1-3):1-11. PubMed ID: 15177740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updating Dosimetry for Emergency Response Dose Projections.
    DeCair S
    Health Phys; 2016 Feb; 110(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 26717183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of current nuclear fallout codes.
    Auxier JP; Auxier JD; Hall HL
    J Environ Radioact; 2017 May; 171():246-252. PubMed ID: 28340486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A note on the number of survey stations required in a mass casualty radiation event.
    Goans RE
    Health Phys; 2007 Dec; 93(6):705-6. PubMed ID: 17993852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A two-step concept to derive a consistent set of intervention levels for radiation emergency planning and to translate international recommendations into practical guidance.
    Wirth E; Baciu AC; Gerich B; Blaettler M; Buettner U; Calvarro JM; Hofer P; Holo EN; Kuhlen J; Molnar K; Nizamska M; Sogalla M; Turai I; Vandecasteele C
    Health Phys; 2011 May; 100(5):482-90. PubMed ID: 21451317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose prediction in Japan for nuclear test explosions in North Korea.
    Takada J
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Nov; 66(11):1683-5. PubMed ID: 18502652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nuclear disasters: current plans and future directions for oncologists.
    Goffman TE
    Am J Disaster Med; 2008; 3(6):317-20. PubMed ID: 19202884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Medical emergency planning in case of severe nuclear power plant accidents].
    Ohlenschläger L
    Fortschr Med; 1980 Aug; 98(30-31):1159-65. PubMed ID: 7419159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction modeling to determine the adequacy of medical response to urban nuclear attack.
    Dallas CE; Bell WC
    Disaster Med Public Health Prep; 2007 Nov; 1(2):80-9. PubMed ID: 18388634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The current state of affairs for disaster planning for a nuclear terrorist attack.
    Goffman TE
    Am J Disaster Med; 2009; 4(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 19378670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple explosions pinpoint hospital's disaster needs.
    Hosp Risk Manage; 1983 Nov; 5(11):141-4. PubMed ID: 10263316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.