These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19066945)

  • 1. Salience detection and attentional capture.
    Schubö A
    Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 19066945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Electrophysiological evidence of low salience distractor interference during visual search.
    Fortier-Gauthier U; Jolicœur P
    Psychophysiology; 2018 Jul; 55(7):e13068. PubMed ID: 29423999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional capture by salient distractors during visual search is determined by temporal task demands.
    Kiss M; Grubert A; Petersen A; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Mar; 24(3):749-59. PubMed ID: 21861683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Saliency affects attentional capture and suppression of abrupt-onset and color singleton distractors: Evidence from event-related potential studies.
    Chen X; Xu B; Chen Y; Zeng X; Zhang Y; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2023 Aug; 60(8):e14290. PubMed ID: 36946491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal.
    Sawaki R; Luck SJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1455-70. PubMed ID: 20675793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
    Theeuwes J; Burger R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dynamics of Feature-based Attentional Selection during Color-Shape Conjunction Search.
    Lee J; Leonard CJ; Luck SJ; Geng JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Dec; 30(12):1773-1787. PubMed ID: 30063176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the electrophysiological evidence for the capture of visual attention.
    McDonald JJ; Green JJ; Jannati A; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):849-60. PubMed ID: 23163789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Eimer M; Kiss M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Aug; 20(8):1423-33. PubMed ID: 18303979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of task set-modulating attentional capture depends on the distractor cost in visual search: evidence from N2pc.
    Zhao D; Liang S; Jin Z; Li L
    Neuroreport; 2014 Jul; 25(10):737-42. PubMed ID: 24840929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Salience-based selection: attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target.
    Zehetleitner M; Koch AI; Goschy H; Müller HJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52595. PubMed ID: 23382820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Object-based selection of irrelevant features is not confined to the attended object.
    Boehler CN; Schoenfeld MA; Heinze HJ; Hopf JM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Sep; 23(9):2231-9. PubMed ID: 20666592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.