These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19068421)

  • 1. A treatment outcome prediction model of visual field recovery using self-organizing maps.
    Guenther T; Mueller I; Preuss M; Kruse R; Sabel BA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):572-81. PubMed ID: 19068421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of two treatment outcome prediction models for restoration of visual fields in patients with postchiasmatic visual pathway lesions.
    Gall C; Steger B; Koehler J; Sabel BA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Sep; 51(11):2271-80. PubMed ID: 23851112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recovery of visual field defects: a large clinical observational study using vision restoration therapy.
    Mueller I; Mast H; Sabel BA
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(5-6):563-72. PubMed ID: 18334773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vision restoration through extrastriate stimulation in patients with visual field defects: a double-blind and randomized experimental study.
    Jobke S; Kasten E; Sabel BA
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2009; 23(3):246-55. PubMed ID: 19240199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer based vision restoration therapy in glaucoma patients: a small open pilot study.
    Gudlin J; Mueller I; Thanos S; Sabel BA
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008; 26(4-5):403-12. PubMed ID: 18997315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Properties of the regained visual field after visual detection training of hemianopsia patients.
    Bergsma DP; Van der Wildt GJ
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008; 26(4-5):365-75. PubMed ID: 18997312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Vision restoration therapy (VRT) efficacy as assessed by comparative perimetric analysis and subjective questionnaires.
    Sabel BA; Kenkel S; Kasten E
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2004; 22(6):399-420. PubMed ID: 15798360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual field recovery after vision restoration therapy (VRT) is independent of eye movements: an eye tracker study.
    Kasten E; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
    Behav Brain Res; 2006 Nov; 175(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 16970999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multifactorial predictors and outcome variables of vision restoration training in patients with post-geniculate visual field loss.
    Poggel DA; Mueller I; Kasten E; Sabel BA
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008; 26(4-5):321-39. PubMed ID: 18997309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vision restoration therapy does not benefit from costimulation: A pilot study.
    Kasten E; Bunzenthal U; Müller-Oehring EM; Mueller I; Sabel BA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Aug; 29(6):569-84. PubMed ID: 17691030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective perimetry using functional magnetic resonance imaging in patients with visual field loss.
    Furuta A; Nakadomari S; Misaki M; Miyauchi S; Iida T
    Exp Neurol; 2009 Jun; 217(2):401-6. PubMed ID: 19348794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reading performance after vision rehabilitation of subjects with homonymous visual field defects.
    Gall C; Sabel BA
    PM R; 2012 Dec; 4(12):928-35. PubMed ID: 23122896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual training of cerebral blindness patients gradually enlarges the visual field.
    Bergsma DP; van der Wildt G
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 19692376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Capturing the benefit of vision restoration therapy.
    Glisson CC
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 17(6):504-8. PubMed ID: 17065916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective and objective outcome measures of computer-based vision restoration training.
    Poggel DA; Mueller I; Kasten E; Bunzenthal U; Sabel BA
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2010; 27(2):173-87. PubMed ID: 20871147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combining visual rehabilitative training and noninvasive brain stimulation to enhance visual function in patients with hemianopia: a comparative case study.
    Plow EB; Obretenova SN; Halko MA; Kenkel S; Jackson ML; Pascual-Leone A; Merabet LB
    PM R; 2011 Sep; 3(9):825-35. PubMed ID: 21944300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Restoration of vision II: residual functions and training-induced visual field enlargement in brain-damaged patients.
    Kasten E; Poggel DA; Müller-Oehring E; Gothe J; Schulte T; Sabel BA
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 1999; 15(2-3):273-87. PubMed ID: 12671238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. From blindsight to sight: cognitive rehabilitation of visual field defects.
    Chokron S; Perez C; Obadia M; Gaudry I; Laloum L; Gout O
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008; 26(4-5):305-20. PubMed ID: 18997308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NovaVision: vision restoration therapy.
    McFadzean RM
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2006 Dec; 17(6):498-503. PubMed ID: 17065915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inverse stimuli in perimetric performance reveal larger visual field defects: implications for vision restoration.
    Kasten E; Guenther T; Sabel BA
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2008; 26(4-5):355-64. PubMed ID: 18997311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.