194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19068473)
1. Proteomic analysis of human osteoprogenitor response to disordered nanotopography.
Kantawong F; Burchmore R; Gadegaard N; Oreffo RO; Dalby MJ
J R Soc Interface; 2009 Nov; 6(40):1075-86. PubMed ID: 19068473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differential in-gel electrophoresis (DIGE) analysis of human bone marrow osteoprogenitor cell contact guidance.
Kantawong F; Burchmore R; Wilkinson CD; Oreffo RO; Dalby MJ
Acta Biomater; 2009 May; 5(4):1137-46. PubMed ID: 19103513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Regulation of implant surface cell adhesion: characterization and quantification of S-phase primary osteoblast adhesions on biomimetic nanoscale substrates.
Biggs MJ; Richards RG; Gadegaard N; Wilkinson CD; Dalby MJ
J Orthop Res; 2007 Feb; 25(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 17106874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nanopit-induced osteoprogenitor cell differentiation: The effect of nanopit depth.
Davison MJ; McMurray RJ; Smith CA; Dalby MJ; Meek RD
J Tissue Eng; 2016; 7():2041731416652778. PubMed ID: 27298716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential interaction of molecular chaperones with procollagen I and type IV collagen in corneal endothelial cells.
Ko MK; Kay EP
Mol Vis; 2002 Jan; 8():1-9. PubMed ID: 11815750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Markers of acute toxicity of DDT exposure in pancreatic beta-cells determined by a proteomic approach.
Pavlikova N; Sramek J; Jelinek M; Halada P; Kovar J
PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0229430. PubMed ID: 33104727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative proteomic profiling of human dental pulp stem cells and periodontal ligament stem cells under in vitro osteogenic induction.
Wang H; Ma D; Zhang X; Xu S; Ning T; Wu B
Arch Oral Biol; 2018 May; 89():9-19. PubMed ID: 29407636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Osteogenic lineage restriction by osteoprogenitors cultured on nanometric grooved surfaces: the role of focal adhesion maturation.
Cassidy JW; Roberts JN; Smith CA; Robertson M; White K; Biggs MJ; Oreffo RO; Dalby MJ
Acta Biomater; 2014 Feb; 10(2):651-60. PubMed ID: 24252447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of proteomics in cancer gene profiling: two-dimensional difference in gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE).
Hariharan D; Weeks ME; Crnogorac-Jurcevic T
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 576():197-211. PubMed ID: 19882264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protein expression profiles of human lymph and plasma mapped by 2D-DIGE and 1D SDS-PAGE coupled with nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS bottom-up proteomics.
Clement CC; Aphkhazava D; Nieves E; Callaway M; Olszewski W; Rotzschke O; Santambrogio L
J Proteomics; 2013 Jan; 78():172-87. PubMed ID: 23202415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage.
Biggs MJ; Richards RG; Gadegaard N; McMurray RJ; Affrossman S; Wilkinson CD; Oreffo RO; Dalby MJ
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Oct; 91(1):195-208. PubMed ID: 18814275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Post-translational modifications and protein-specific isoforms in endometriosis revealed by 2D DIGE.
Stephens AN; Hannan NJ; Rainczuk A; Meehan KL; Chen J; Nicholls PK; Rombauts LJ; Stanton PG; Robertson DM; Salamonsen LA
J Proteome Res; 2010 May; 9(5):2438-49. PubMed ID: 20199104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of replicate types on proteomic expression analysis.
Karp NA; Spencer M; Lindsay H; O'Dell K; Lilley KS
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(5):1867-71. PubMed ID: 16212444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing the osteogenicity of nanotopography using block co-polymer phase separation fabrication techniques.
Maclaine SE; Gadhari N; Pugin R; Meek RM; Liley M; Dalby MJ
J Orthop Res; 2012 Aug; 30(8):1190-7. PubMed ID: 22294345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of proteomic differential displays to assess functional discrepancies and adjustments of human bone marrow- and Wharton jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells.
Kuo HC; Chiu CC; Chang WC; Sheen JM; Ou CY; Kuo HC; Chen RF; Hsu TY; Chang JC; Hsaio CC; Wang FS; Huang CC; Huang HY; Yang KD
J Proteome Res; 2011 Mar; 10(3):1305-15. PubMed ID: 21155588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-throughput proteomic analysis of human infiltrating ductal carcinoma of the breast.
Somiari RI; Sullivan A; Russell S; Somiari S; Hu H; Jordan R; George A; Katenhusen R; Buchowiecka A; Arciero C; Brzeski H; Hooke J; Shriver C
Proteomics; 2003 Oct; 3(10):1863-73. PubMed ID: 14625848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Whole proteome analysis of osteoprogenitor differentiation induced by disordered nanotopography and mediated by ERK signalling.
Kantawong F; Burgess KE; Jayawardena K; Hart A; Burchmore RJ; Gadegaard N; Oreffo RO; Dalby MJ
Biomaterials; 2009 Sep; 30(27):4723-31. PubMed ID: 19560200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis and 2D-DIGE.
Meleady P
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1664():3-14. PubMed ID: 29019120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies.
Dalby MJ; McCloy D; Robertson M; Agheli H; Sutherland D; Affrossman S; Oreffo RO
Biomaterials; 2006 May; 27(15):2980-7. PubMed ID: 16443268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A UPR-independent infection-specific role for a BiP/GRP78 protein in the control of antimicrobial peptide expression in C. elegans epidermis.
Couillault C; Fourquet P; Pophillat M; Ewbank JJ
Virulence; 2012 May; 3(3):299-308. PubMed ID: 22546897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
