These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19068546)

  • 1. The people speak: voters faced important and sometimes complex policy questions on statewide ballots.
    Bowser JD
    State Legis; 2008 Dec; 34(10):19-20. PubMed ID: 19068546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ballots in hand. Voters set to decide key questions of healthcare finance, medical policy.
    Mod Healthc; 2000 Oct; 30(45):28-9. PubMed ID: 12030247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. State constitutional law - same-sex relations - Supreme Court of Michigan holds that public employers may not provide healthcare benefits to same-sex domestic partners of employees. - National Pride at Work, Inc. v. Governor of Michigan, 748 N.W.2d 524 (Mich. 2008).
    Harv Law Rev; 2009 Feb; 122(4):1263-70. PubMed ID: 19288616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions.
    Vanzi LM
    N M Law Rev; 1996; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marriage amendment ballots of 2004: could state residents read them?
    Greenberg D; Gazmararian J; Burke V
    Soc Work Public Health; 2008; 23(5):1-11. PubMed ID: 19301535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do fetal rights limit mothers' rights?
    State Legis; 2002 Jun; 28(6):6. PubMed ID: 12051253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Warning: contraceptive drugs may cause political headaches.
    Charo RA
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Apr; 366(15):1361-4. PubMed ID: 22417204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cases with Consequences: Recent Supreme Court rulings were game-changers for the states--and not just because of the decisions on health care and same-sex marriage.
    Soronen L
    State Legis; 2015 Sep; 41(8):19-21. PubMed ID: 26320276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Privacy rights and abortion outing: a proposal for using common-law torts to protect abortion patients and staff.
    Clapman A
    Yale Law J; 2003 Apr; 112(6):1545-76. PubMed ID: 15046034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Puppy love: bioterrorism, civil rights, and public health.
    Annas GJ
    Fla Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 55(5):1171-90. PubMed ID: 15478248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Battles at the ballot box. Voters to decide a variety of healthcare referendums.
    Duff S
    Mod Healthc; 2002 Sep; 32(38):26. PubMed ID: 12375352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Civil unions in Vermont: political attitudes, religious fundamentalism, and sexual prejudice.
    Saucier DA; Cawman AJ
    J Homosex; 2004; 48(1):1-18. PubMed ID: 15774415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physically Intrusive Abortion Restrictions as Fourth Amendment Searches and Seizures: A new conceptual avenue for challenging abortion restrictions.
    Harv Law Rev; 2015 Jan; 128(3):951-72. PubMed ID: 26793815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Casey reflections.
    Cavendish EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 16526134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment.
    Shapiro AA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voting rights for older Americans with dementia: implications for health care providers.
    Wislowski A; Cuellar N
    Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 16597524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why the unconstitutional conditions doctrine is an anachronism (with particular reference to religion, speech, and abortion).
    Sunstein CR
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Jul; 70(4):593-621. PubMed ID: 15739275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What Lawrence v. Texas says about the history and future of reproductive rights.
    Dailard C
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):717-23. PubMed ID: 16700117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproductive freedom and the next president.
    Adashi EY; West DM
    N Engl J Med; 2008 Oct; 359(18):1867-9. PubMed ID: 18971488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.