124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19070233)
1. Quantification of radiotracer uptake with a dedicated breast PET imaging system.
Raylmana RR; Smith MF; Kinahan PE; Majewski S
Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):4989-97. PubMed ID: 19070233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The positron emission mammography/tomography breast imaging and biopsy system (PEM/PET): design, construction and phantom-based measurements.
Raylman RR; Majewski S; Smith MF; Proffitt J; Hammond W; Srinivasan A; McKisson J; Popov V; Weisenberger A; Judy CO; Kross B; Ramasubramanian S; Banta LE; Kinahan PE; Champley K
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):637-53. PubMed ID: 18199907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating attenuation correction strategies in a dedicated, single-gantry breast PET-tomosynthesis scanner.
Krishnamoorthy S; Vent T; Barufaldi B; Maidment ADA; Karp JS; Surti S
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(23):235028. PubMed ID: 33113520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: Numerical observer study of lesion detection.
Raylman RR; Stolin A; Hays S; Johnson E; Lankas S; Mekonnen M; Roemer K
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7489-7496. PubMed ID: 36219487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DH-Mammo PET: a dual-head positron emission mammography system for breast imaging.
Shi Y; Wang Y; Zhou J; Zhu Y; Lyu X; Hui H; Wen B; Liu Y; Li L; Li J; Meng F; Kang F; Zhu S
Phys Med Biol; 2022 Oct; 67(20):. PubMed ID: 36126658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Why is TOF PET reconstruction a more robust method in the presence of inconsistent data?
Conti M
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jan; 56(1):155-68. PubMed ID: 21119224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification with a dedicated breast PET/CT scanner.
Bowen SL; Ferrero A; Badawi RD
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2694-707. PubMed ID: 22559640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance Evaluation of a New Dedicated Breast PET Scanner Using NEMA NU4-2008 Standards.
Miyake KK; Matsumoto K; Inoue M; Nakamoto Y; Kanao S; Oishi T; Kawase S; Kitamura K; Yamakawa Y; Akazawa A; Kobayashi T; Ohi J; Togashi K
J Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 55(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 24812244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance evaluation of the MOLECUBES β-CUBE-a high spatial resolution and high sensitivity small animal PET scanner utilizing monolithic LYSO scintillation detectors.
Krishnamoorthy S; Blankemeyer E; Mollet P; Surti S; Van Holen R; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(15):155013. PubMed ID: 29938684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: Evaluation of basic performance characteristics.
Raylman RR; Van Kampen W; Stolin AV; Gong W; Jaliparthi G; Martone PF; Smith MF; Sarment D; Clinthorne NH; Perna M
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1603-1613. PubMed ID: 29389017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast 3D-EM reconstruction using Planograms for stationary planar positron emission mammography camera.
Motta A; Guerra AD; Belcari N; Moehrs S; Panetta D; Righi S; Valentini D
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Dec; 29(8):587-96. PubMed ID: 16290284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of errors caused by X-ray scatter and use of contrast medium when using CT-based attenuation correction in PET.
Ay MR; Zaidi H
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2006 Nov; 33(11):1301-13. PubMed ID: 16622710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the limits of PET/CT imaging at very low true count rates and high random fractions in ion-beam therapy monitoring.
Kurz C; Bauer J; Conti M; Guérin L; Eriksson L; Parodi K
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3979-91. PubMed ID: 26133598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Integrated PET/MR breast cancer imaging: Attenuation correction and implementation of a 16-channel RF coil.
Oehmigen M; Lindemann ME; Lanz T; Kinner S; Quick HH
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4808. PubMed ID: 27487899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility study of a point-of-care positron emission tomography system with interactive imaging capability.
Jiang J; Li K; Komarov S; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC
Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 46(4):1798-1813. PubMed ID: 30667069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D directional gradient L
Shi Y; Wang Y; Meng F; Zhou J; Wen B; Zhang X; Liu Y; Li L; Li J; Cao X; Kang F; Zhu S
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Jul; 161():107010. PubMed ID: 37235943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of Philips Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging capabilities.
Surti S; Kuhn A; Werner ME; Perkins AE; Kolthammer J; Karp JS
J Nucl Med; 2007 Mar; 48(3):471-80. PubMed ID: 17332626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of the quantitative accuracy of a commercially available positron emission mammography scanner.
Springer A; Mawlawi OR
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2132-9. PubMed ID: 21626946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Compartment modeling of dynamic brain PET--the impact of scatter corrections on parameter errors.
Häggström I; Schmidtlein CR; Karlsson M; Larsson A
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111907. PubMed ID: 25370640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Background ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in positron emission mammography (PEM): correlation with mammographic density and background parenchymal enhancement in breast MRI.
Koo HR; Moon WK; Chun IK; Eo JS; Jeyanth JX; Chang JM; Cho N; Kang KW
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1738-42. PubMed ID: 23806533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
