BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19070236)

  • 1. The use of EPID-measured leaf sequence files for IMRT dose reconstruction in adaptive radiation therapy.
    Lee L; Mao W; Xing L
    Med Phys; 2008 Nov; 35(11):5019-29. PubMed ID: 19070236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A high-speed scintillation-based electronic portal imaging device to quantitatively characterize IMRT delivery.
    Ranade MK; Lynch BD; Li JG; Dempsey JF
    Med Phys; 2006 Jan; 33(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 16485415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output.
    Agnew CE; King RB; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6761-77. PubMed ID: 23032423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
    Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comprehensive fluence model for absolute portal dose image prediction.
    Chytyk K; McCurdy BM
    Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1389-98. PubMed ID: 19472646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomy-based, patient-specific VMAT QA using EPID or MLC log files.
    Defoor DL; Vazquez-Quino LA; Mavroidis P; Papanikolaou N; Stathakis S
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 May; 16(3):5283. PubMed ID: 26103490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Experimental investigation of the response of an amorphous silicon EPID to intensity modulated radiotherapy beams.
    Greer PB; Vial P; Oliver L; Baldock C
    Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4389-98. PubMed ID: 18072504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Verification of step-and-shoot IMRT delivery using a fast video-based electronic portal imaging device.
    Zeidan OA; Li JG; Ranade M; Stell AM; Dempsey JF
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):463-76. PubMed ID: 15070242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance for online adapted treatment plans: benchmarking and delivery monitoring simulation.
    Li T; Wu Q; Yang Y; Rodrigues A; Yin FF; Jackie Wu Q
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 25563278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of the individual multileaf collimator positional deviations during dynamic IMRT delivery priori with artificial neural network.
    Osman AFI; Maalej NM; Jayesh K
    Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1421-1430. PubMed ID: 31922604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An energy fluence-convolution model for amorphous silicon EPID dose prediction.
    Greer PB; Cadman P; Lee C; Bzdusek K
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 19291994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical experience with EPID dosimetry for prostate IMRT pre-treatment dose verification.
    McDermott LN; Wendling M; van Asselen B; Stroom J; Sonke JJ; van Herk M; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3921-30. PubMed ID: 17089854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detecting MLC modeling errors using radiomics-based machine learning in patient-specific QA with an EPID for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Sakai M; Nakano H; Kawahara D; Tanabe S; Takizawa T; Narita A; Yamada T; Sakai H; Ueda M; Sasamoto R; Kaidu M; Aoyama H; Ishikawa H; Utsunomiya S
    Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):991-1002. PubMed ID: 33382467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving IMRT quality control efficiency using an amorphous silicon electronic portal imager.
    Budgell GJ; Zhang Q; Trouncer RJ; Mackay RI
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3267-78. PubMed ID: 16370416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Varian DynaLog file-based procedure for patient dose-volume histogram-based IMRT QA.
    Calvo-Ortega JF; Teke T; Moragues S; Pozo M; Casals-Farran J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4665. PubMed ID: 24710455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo based IMRT dose verification using MLC log files and R/V outputs.
    Luo W; Li J; Price RA; Chen L; Yang J; Fan J; Chen Z; McNeeley S; Xu X; Ma CM
    Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2557-64. PubMed ID: 16898460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monitoring daily MLC positional errors using trajectory log files and EPID measurements for IMRT and VMAT deliveries.
    Agnew A; Agnew CE; Grattan MW; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 May; 59(9):N49-63. PubMed ID: 24732210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A quantitative study of IMRT delivery effects in commercial planning systems for the case of oesophagus and prostate tumours.
    Seco J; Clark CH; Evans PM; Webb S
    Br J Radiol; 2006 May; 79(941):401-8. PubMed ID: 16632620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the performance of two different types of commercial software programs for 3D patient dose reconstruction for prostate cancer patients: Machine log files vs. machine log files with EPID images.
    Kadoya N; Kon Y; Takayama Y; Matsumoto T; Hayashi N; Katsuta Y; Ito K; Chiba T; Dobashi S; Takeda K; Jingu K
    Phys Med; 2018 Jan; 45():170-176. PubMed ID: 29472083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commissioning and quality assurance for VMAT delivery systems: An efficient time-resolved system using real-time EPID imaging.
    Zwan BJ; Barnes MP; Hindmarsh J; Lim SB; Lovelock DM; Fuangrod T; O'Connor DJ; Keall PJ; Greer PB
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3909-3922. PubMed ID: 28564208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.