These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19070338)

  • 1. Sensitivity of conditional-discrimination performance to within-session variation of reinforcer frequency.
    Ward RD; Odum AL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2008 Nov; 90(3):301-11. PubMed ID: 19070338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Concurrent-schedule performance in transition: changeover delays and signaled reinforcer ratios.
    Krägeloh CU; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jan; 79(1):87-109. PubMed ID: 12696743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of prefeeding, extinction, and distraction during sample and comparison presentation on sensitivity to reinforcer frequency in matching to sample.
    Ward RD; Johnson RN; Odum AL
    Behav Processes; 2009 May; 81(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 19429198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Divided stimulus control depends on differential and nondifferential reinforcement: Testing a quantitative model.
    Gomes-Ng S; Cowie S; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2023 Nov; 120(3):344-362. PubMed ID: 37581958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Jul; 80(1):95-129. PubMed ID: 13677611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Divided stimulus control: a replication and a quantitative model.
    Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Jul; 94(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 21279159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contingency discriminability and peak shift in concurrent schedules.
    Krägeloh CU; Elliffe DM; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):11-30. PubMed ID: 16903490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts.
    Davison M; Baum WM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2000 Jul; 74(1):1-24. PubMed ID: 10966094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Divided stimulus control: Which key did you peck, or what color was it?
    Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2018 Jan; 109(1):107-124. PubMed ID: 29194638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Signaled reinforcement: Effects of signal reliability on choice between signaled and unsignaled alternatives.
    Gomes-Ng S; Macababbad AC; Bai JYH; Baharrizki D; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    Behav Processes; 2020 May; 174():104088. PubMed ID: 32092454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.
    Boutros N; Elliffe D; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Sep; 96(2):227-41. PubMed ID: 21909166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The generalization-across-dimensions model applied to conditional temporal discrimination.
    Davison M; Cowie S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2024 May; 121(3):327-345. PubMed ID: 38629655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does overall reinforcer rate affect discrimination of time-based contingencies?
    Cowie S; Davison M; Blumhardt L; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2016 May; 105(3):393-408. PubMed ID: 27151836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Choice in a variable environment: effects of unequal reinforcer distributions.
    Landon J; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Sep; 80(2):187-204. PubMed ID: 14674728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signaled and unsignaled terminal links in concurrent chains I: effects of reinforcer probability and immediacy.
    Mattson KM; Hucks A; Grace RC; McLean AP
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2010 Nov; 94(3):327-52. PubMed ID: 21541175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing compound stimuli: Relative reinforcer probabilities divide stimulus control in the multiple peak procedure.
    Gomes-Ng S; Elliffe D; Cowie S
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Apr; 46(2):124-138. PubMed ID: 31804106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of reinforcer magnitude on responding under differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedules of rats and pigeons.
    Doughty AH; Richards JB
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2002 Jul; 78(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 12144310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Response strength in extreme multiple schedules.
    McLean AP; Grace RC; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2012 Jan; 97(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 22287804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcer magnitude in a detection task.
    Alsop B; Porritt M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jan; 85(1):41-56. PubMed ID: 16602375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity to relative reinforcer rate in concurrent schedules: independence from relative and absolute reinforcer duration.
    McLean AP; Blampied NM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Jan; 75(1):25-42. PubMed ID: 11256865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.