BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19070751)

  • 1. Anteroposterior position of mandible and perceived need for orthognathic surgery.
    de Almeida MD; Bittencourt MA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 19070751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An Asian community's perspective on facial profile attractiveness.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2007 Feb; 35(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier.
    Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.
    Magro-Filho O; Magro-Ernica N; Queiroz TP; Aranega AM; Garcia IR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. PubMed ID: 20362896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative evaluation of the soft tissue profile in the planning of orthognathic surgery.
    Lundström A; Paulin G; Forsberg CM
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 8228432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Preoperative cephalometric simulation in orthodontic surgery].
    Duclos P; Freidel M; Mayeux JF; Durand J
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 1991; 92(6):368-72. PubMed ID: 1784979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does skeletal facial profile influence preoperative motives and postoperative satisfaction? A prospective study of 66 surgical-orthodontic patients.
    Øland J; Jensen J; Papadopoulos MA; Melsen B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):2025-32. PubMed ID: 21398004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real-time orthognathic surgical simulation using a mandibular motion tracking system.
    Fushima K; Kobayashi M; Konishi H; Minagichi K; Fukuchi T
    Comput Aided Surg; 2007 Mar; 12(2):91-104. PubMed ID: 17487659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characteristics and corrective outcome of face asymmetry by orthognathic surgery.
    Ko EW; Huang CS; Chen YR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Oct; 67(10):2201-9. PubMed ID: 19761914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Single-stage comprehensive surgical treatment of the rheumatoid arthritis temporomandibular joint patient.
    Mehra P; Wolford LM; Baran S; Cassano DS
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1859-72. PubMed ID: 19686922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Temporomandibular dysfunction in 1,516 patients before and after orthognathic surgery.
    Westermark A; Shayeghi F; Thor A
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):145-51. PubMed ID: 11482293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Face bow and articulator for planning orthognathic surgery: 2 articulator.
    Walker F; Ayoub AF; Moos KF; Barbenel J
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 46(7):573-8. PubMed ID: 18462853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The surgical treatment of prognathism, mandibular retrognathism and superior prognathism].
    Trauner R
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1967 Dec; 84(12):855-66. PubMed ID: 4867289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Profile changes in orthodontic patients treated with mandibular advancement surgery.
    Tsang ST; McFadden LR; Wiltshire WA; Pershad N; Baker AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 19121503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical differences in facial profiles by orthodontists and lay people.
    Romani KL; Agahi F; Nanda R; Zernik JH
    Angle Orthod; 1993; 63(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 8214785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment.
    Baker BW; Woods MG
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(2):108-20. PubMed ID: 11482289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How the lower face soft tissue changes after mandibular advancement or setback.
    Alves PV; Mazucheli J; Vogel CJ; Bolognese AM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 May; 19(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 18520370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology before and after orthognathic surgery.
    Kobayashi T; Ueda K; Honma K; Sasakura H; Hanada K; Nakajima T
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1990 Feb; 18(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 2312741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.