BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19070751)

  • 21. Subjective evaluation of profile prediction using video imaging.
    Giangreco TA; Forbes DP; Jacobson RS; Kallal RH; Moretti RJ; Marshall SD
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 9082009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Asymmetry of the lips of orthognathic surgery patients.
    Yamashita Y; Nakamura Y; Shimada T; Nomura Y; Hirashita A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 19815159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Considerations for orthognathic surgery during growth, part 1: mandibular deformities.
    Wolford LM; Karras SC; Mehra P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Feb; 119(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11174553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An orthognathic simulation system integrating teeth, jaw and face data using 3D cephalometry.
    Noguchi N; Tsuji M; Shigematsu M; Goto M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):640-5. PubMed ID: 17368000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics.
    Soh J; Chew MT; Wong HB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Jun; 127(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 15953894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Soft tissue profile changes after vertical ramus osteotomy.
    Naoumova J; Söderfeldt B; Lindman R
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):359-65. PubMed ID: 18524760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Orthodontists' perceptions of the need for orthognathic surgery in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion based on extraoral examinations.
    Hodge TM; Boyd PT; Munyombwe T; Littlewood SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 22748990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences.
    Coleman GG; Lindauer SJ; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Best AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17628248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How accurate is model planning for orthognathic surgery?
    Sharifi A; Jones R; Ayoub A; Moos K; Walker F; Khambay B; McHugh S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 37(12):1089-93. PubMed ID: 18760569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Correction of maxillary protrusion with severe vertical dysplasia--a multidisciplinary approach.
    Tarsitano JJ; Wooten JW; Sachsel AJ; Bredlinger DL; Arvystas MG
    J Oral Surg; 1973 Sep; 31(9):675-81. PubMed ID: 4578692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of combined maxillary and mandibular repositioning and of soft tissue prediction in relation to maxillary antero-superior repositioning combined with mandibular set back A computerized cephalometric evaluation of the immediate postsurgical outcome using the TIOPS planning system.
    Donatsky O; Bjørn-Jørgensen J; Hermund NU; Nielsen H; Holmqvist-Larsen M; Nerder PH
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 37(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 19188076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible.
    Orsini MG; Huang GJ; Kiyak HA; Ramsay DS; Bollen AM; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 16979485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changes in soft tissue profile after mandibular setback surgery in Class III subjects.
    Marşan G; Oztaş E; Kuvat SV; Cura N; Emekli U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):236-40. PubMed ID: 19153028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Endoscopic approach for mandibular orthognathic surgery.
    Troulis MJ; Ramirez JL; Kaban LB
    Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 16466983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Surgical corrections of mandibular forced bites].
    Spitzer WJ
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Nov; 44(11 Spec No):S33-6. PubMed ID: 2637820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predicting soft tissue changes in mandibular advancement surgery: a comparison of two video imaging systems.
    Syliangco ST; Sameshima GT; Kaminishi RM; Sinclair PM
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(5):337-46. PubMed ID: 9347107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Three-dimensional computer-assisted simulation combining facial skeleton with facial morphology for orthognathic surgery.
    Chen LH; Chen WH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 10686837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A 3-Dimensional Facial Morpho-Dynamic Database in the development of a prediction model in orthognathic surgery.
    Peretta R; Concheri G; Comelli D; Meneghello R; Galzignato PF; Ferronato G
    Prog Orthod; 2008; 9(2):8-19. PubMed ID: 19350055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stability of hard tissue profile after mandibular setback in sagittal split osteotomies: a longitudinal and long-term follow-up study.
    Joss CU; Thüer UW
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Aug; 30(4):352-8. PubMed ID: 18678756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Glenoid fossa position in Class III malocclusion associated with mandibular protrusion.
    Innocenti C; Giuntini V; Defraia E; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):438-41. PubMed ID: 19361728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.