These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19070753)

  • 1. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Swennen GR; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 19070753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam CT scans and conventional frontal radiographs of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Swennen GR; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 38(7):773-8. PubMed ID: 19369033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between two-dimensional and three-dimensional cephalometry on frontal radiographs and on cone beam computed tomography scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 19583759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between 2D and 3D cephalometry on CBCT scans of human skulls.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Maal T; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Katsaros C; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 20044238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conventional frontal radiographs compared with frontal radiographs obtained from cone beam computed tomography.
    Nur M; Kayipmaz S; Bayram M; Celikoglu M; Kilkis D; Sezgin OS
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Jul; 82(4):579-84. PubMed ID: 21999214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The reliability of cephalometric measurements in oral and maxillofacial imaging: Cone beam computed tomography versus two-dimensional digital cephalograms.
    Hariharan A; Diwakar NR; Jayanthi K; Hema HM; Deepukrishna S; Ghaste SR
    Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(4):370-377. PubMed ID: 27723632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.
    Kumar V; Ludlow JB; Mol A; Cevidanes L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Jul; 36(5):263-9. PubMed ID: 17586852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of linear temporomandibular joint measurements with cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalometric radiography.
    Hilgers ML; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):803-11. PubMed ID: 16360924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull.
    Berco M; Rigali PH; Miner RM; DeLuca S; Anderson NK; Will LA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):17.e1-9; discussion 17-8. PubMed ID: 19577142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of linear measurements from imaging plate and lateral cephalometric images derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
    Moshiri M; Scarfe WC; Hilgers ML; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):550-60. PubMed ID: 17920510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images.
    Brown AA; Scarfe WC; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):150-7. PubMed ID: 19123719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements performed in full and hemifacial reconstructions derived from cone beam computed tomography.
    Ramírez-Sotelo LR; Almeida S; Ambrosano GM; Bóscolo F
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):827-32. PubMed ID: 22332664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of observer reliability of three-dimensional cephalometric landmark identification on subject images from Galileos and i-CAT cone beam CT.
    Katkar RA; Kummet C; Dawson D; Moreno Uribe L; Allareddy V; Finkelstein M; Ruprecht A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130059. PubMed ID: 23833319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurements on 3D models of human skulls derived from two different cone beam CT scanners.
    van Vlijmen OJ; Rangel FA; Bergé SJ; Bronkhorst EM; Becking AG; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):721-7. PubMed ID: 20640463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating craniofacial asymmetry with digital cephalometric images and cone-beam computed tomography.
    de Moraes ME; Hollender LG; Chen CS; Moraes LC; Balducci I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):e523-31. PubMed ID: 21640864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of linear measurements using three imaging modalities: two lateral cephalograms and one 3D model from CBCT data.
    Pittayapat P; Bornstein MM; Imada TS; Coucke W; Lambrichts I; Jacobs R
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):202-8. PubMed ID: 25161199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of linear and angular measurements using two-dimensional conventional methods and three-dimensional cone beam CT images reconstructed from a volumetric rendering program in vivo.
    Oz U; Orhan K; Abe N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Dec; 40(8):492-500. PubMed ID: 22065798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cone-beam computed tomography: accuracy of three-dimensional cephalometry analysis and influence of patient scanning position.
    Frongia G; Piancino MG; Bracco P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 23(4):1038-43. PubMed ID: 22777473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls.
    Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 49(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 20615593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.