354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19070873)
1. Radiation safety: implications for urologists and patients.
Keeley FX; Thornton M
J Urol; 2009 Feb; 181(2):443-4. PubMed ID: 19070873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The choosing wisely campaign and its potential impact on diagnostic radiation burden.
Mahesh M; Durand DJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Jan; 10(1):65-6. PubMed ID: 23211613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Computerized tomography. Understanding the risks and benefits.
Mayo Clin Womens Healthsource; 2010 Sep; 14(9):1-2. PubMed ID: 20736898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed tomography and radiation: understanding the issues.
Frush DP; Applegate K
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 17411538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation exposure from CT scans: how to close our knowledge gaps, monitor and safeguard exposure--proceedings and recommendations of the Radiation Dose Summit, sponsored by NIBIB, February 24-25, 2011.
Boone JM; Hendee WR; McNitt-Gray MF; Seltzer SE
Radiology; 2012 Nov; 265(2):544-54. PubMed ID: 22966066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Limiting the risks of radiation exposure in diagnostic imaging.
Ray P; Vu T; Romero M; Perrier ND
Surgery; 2014 Dec; 156(6):1297-9. PubMed ID: 25456899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A doctor talks about radiation risk from medical imaging.
Robb-Nicholson C
Harv Womens Health Watch; 2010 Oct; 18(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 21268315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Dose reduction in CT.
Hemme E
Radiol Technol; 2010; 82(2):196-8. PubMed ID: 21048071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. CT dose metrics.
Huda W
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):964-5. PubMed ID: 23704294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Response.
McCollough CH
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):966-7. PubMed ID: 23844422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Response.
Brady SL; Kaufman RA
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):965-6. PubMed ID: 23844421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Response.
Bankier AA; Kressel HY
Radiology; 2013 Jun; 267(3):966. PubMed ID: 23844420
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. CT radiation dose reduction by modifying primary factors.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Thrall JH; Mahesh M
J Am Coll Radiol; 2011 May; 8(5):369-72. PubMed ID: 21531317
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. CT in children: why and what to consider for CT in children.
Riccabona M
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 82(7):1041-2. PubMed ID: 22197091
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation dose shift in relative proportion: the case of coronary artery calcium studies.
Mahesh M; Zimmerman SL; Fishman EK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Jun; 11(6):634-5. PubMed ID: 24726446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and dose reduction in CT.
Bankier AA; Kressel HY
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 22993216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation protection of medical staff.
Le Heron J; Padovani R; Smith I; Czarwinski R
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Oct; 76(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20656429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Current methods of monitoring radiation exposure from CT.
Talati RK; Dunkin J; Parikh S; Moore WH
J Am Coll Radiol; 2013 Sep; 10(9):702-7. PubMed ID: 23714720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Imaging wisely: patient safety in CT.
Lu ZF; Thomas S
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Mar; 41(3):452-60. PubMed ID: 26971337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Point: Should the ALARA Concept and Image Gently Campaign Be Terminated?
Cohen MD
J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1195-1198. PubMed ID: 27317375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
