108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19071989)
1. [BASETY: Meaning extension and typicality of examples for 21 categories of objects].
Léger L; Boumlak H; Tijus C
Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):223-32. PubMed ID: 19071989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. German norms for semantic typicality, age of acquisition, and concept familiarity.
Schröder A; Gemballa T; Ruppin S; Wartenburger I
Behav Res Methods; 2012 Jun; 44(2):380-94. PubMed ID: 22190280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dutch norm data for 13 semantic categories and 338 exemplars.
Ruts W; De Deyne S; Ameel E; Vanpaemel W; Verbeemen T; Storms G
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2004 Aug; 36(3):506-15. PubMed ID: 15641439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exemplar by feature applicability matrices and other Dutch normative data for semantic concepts.
De Deyne S; Verheyen S; Ameel E; Vanpaemel W; Dry MJ; Voorspoels W; Storms G
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1030-48. PubMed ID: 19001394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of schizotypy with semantic processing differences: an event-related brain potential study.
Kiang M; Kutas M
Schizophr Res; 2005 Sep; 77(2-3):329-42. PubMed ID: 15919182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abnormal typicality of responses on a category fluency task in schizotypy.
Kiang M; Kutas M
Psychiatry Res; 2006 Dec; 145(2-3):119-26. PubMed ID: 17070931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spanish norms for age of acquisition, concept familiarity, lexical frequency, manipulability, typicality, and other variables for 820 words from 14 living/nonliving concepts.
Moreno-Martínez FJ; Montoro PR; Rodríguez-Rojo IC
Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1088-97. PubMed ID: 24415408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. French categorization norms for 70 semantic categories and comparison with Van Overschelde et al.'s (2004) English norms.
Bueno S; Megherbi H
Behav Res Methods; 2009 Nov; 41(4):1018-28. PubMed ID: 19897810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of verbal typicality judgments of mentally retarded and nonretarded persons.
Winters JJ; Hoats DL
Am J Ment Defic; 1985 Nov; 90(3):335-41. PubMed ID: 4083313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables.
Ferrand L; Bonin P; Méot A; Augustinova M; New B; Pallier C; Brysbaert M
Behav Res Methods; 2008 Nov; 40(4):1049-54. PubMed ID: 19001395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Available but unattended conceptual information in working memory: temporarily active semantic content or persistent memory for prior operations?
Woltz DJ; Was CA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Jan; 33(1):155-68. PubMed ID: 17201559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can prediction-based distributional semantic models predict typicality?
Heyman T; Heyman G
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):2084-2109. PubMed ID: 30704340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrophysiological correlates of word comprehension: event-related potential (ERP) and independent component analysis (ICA).
Mehta J; Jerger S; Jerger J; Martin J
Int J Audiol; 2009 Jan; 48(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 19173108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Validation of the French translation of the impulsive nonconformity scale].
Foullu S; Danet F; Dumas P; Brunelin J; Travart M; Elchardus JM; Saoud M; d'Amato T
Encephale; 2008 Dec; 34(6):563-9. PubMed ID: 19081452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Conjuctions of visually based categories: overextension and compensation.
Hampton JA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Mar; 22(2):378-96. PubMed ID: 8901342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exemplars and prototypes in natural language concepts: a typicality-based evaluation.
Voorspoels W; Vanpaemel W; Storms G
Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):630-7. PubMed ID: 18567266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Typicality modulates attentional capture by object categories.
Lim YI; Clement A; Pratt J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1397-1406. PubMed ID: 33506355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ideals and category typicality.
Kim S; Murphy GL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1092-112. PubMed ID: 21767059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The instantiation principle in natural categories.
Heit E; Barsalou LW
Memory; 1996 Jul; 4(4):413-51. PubMed ID: 8817461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A rose in any other font would not smell as sweet: effects of perceptual fluency on categorization.
Oppenheimer DM; Frank MC
Cognition; 2008 Mar; 106(3):1178-94. PubMed ID: 17618616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
