These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19071990)

  • 1. Attentional capture by a salient distractor in visual search: the effect of target-distractor similarity.
    Poiese P; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Dec; 62(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 19071990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
    Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes.
    Lamy D; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Oct; 29(5):1003-20. PubMed ID: 14585019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intertrial target-feature changes do not lead to more distraction by singletons: target uncertainty does.
    Lamy D; Yashar A
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(10):1274-9. PubMed ID: 18395767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological evidence of the capture of visual attention.
    Hickey C; McDonald JJ; Theeuwes J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):604-13. PubMed ID: 16768363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm.
    Leblanc E; Prime DJ; Jolicoeur P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 20(4):657-71. PubMed ID: 18052780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection.
    Geng JJ; Diquattro NE
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):5. PubMed ID: 20884554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Irrelevant singletons in pop-out search: attentional capture or filtering costs?
    Becker SI
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):764-87. PubMed ID: 17683227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Absence of attentional capture in parallel search is possible: a failure to replicate attentional capture in a non-singleton target search task.
    Wienrich C; Janczyk M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2044-52. PubMed ID: 21805210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Focal distraction: spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture.
    Ghorashi SM; Zuvic SM; Visser TA; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Feb; 29(1):78-91. PubMed ID: 12669749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early and late modulation of saccade deviations by target distractor similarity.
    Mulckhuyse M; Van der Stigchel S; Theeuwes J
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Sep; 102(3):1451-8. PubMed ID: 19553494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of perceptual load on attention-induced motion blindness: the efficiency of selective inhibition.
    Hay JL; Milders MM; Sahraie A; Niedeggen M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Aug; 32(4):885-907. PubMed ID: 16846286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Input control processes in rapid serial visual presentations: target selection and distractor inhibition.
    Olivers CN; Watson DG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Oct; 32(5):1083-92. PubMed ID: 17002523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience.
    Lu S; Han S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):1015-26. PubMed ID: 19525534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The remains of the trial: goal-determined inter-trial suppression of selective attention.
    Lleras A; Levinthal BR; Kawahara J
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():195-213. PubMed ID: 19733758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 18411071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preparatory attention: experiment and theory.
    LaBerge D; Auclair L; Sieroff E
    Conscious Cogn; 2000 Sep; 9(3):396-434. PubMed ID: 10993667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set.
    Müller HJ; Geyer T; Zehetleitner M; Krummenacher J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19170466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.