BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19072000)

  • 1. A proposed framework for conducting data-based test analysis.
    Slaney KL; Maraun MD
    Psychol Methods; 2008 Dec; 13(4):376-90. PubMed ID: 19072000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendations for applying tests of equivalence.
    Cribbie RA; Gruman JA; Arpin-Cribbie CA
    J Clin Psychol; 2004 Jan; 60(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14692005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three-mode analysis of multimode covariance matrices.
    Kroonenberg PM; Oort FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2003 Nov; 56(Pt 2):305-35. PubMed ID: 14633338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Asymptotically distribution-free (ADF) interval estimation of coefficient alpha.
    Maydeu-Olivares A; Coffman DL; Hartmann WM
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 17563170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reporting subscores for institutions.
    Haberman S; Sinharay S; Puhan G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):79-95. PubMed ID: 17937841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the far reaching effects of using biased estimates of score reliability: an examination of the problem in 20 data analyses.
    Becker G
    Psychol Rep; 2001 Oct; 89(2):291-307. PubMed ID: 11783552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence analysis for the factor analysis model with ranking data.
    Xu L; Poon WY; Lee SY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 May; 61(Pt 1):133-61. PubMed ID: 18482479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change.
    Raudenbush SW; Xiao-Feng L
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 11778679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model selection for minimum-diameter partitioning.
    Brusco MJ; Steinley D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):471-95. PubMed ID: 24192201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: measures of effect size for some common research designs.
    Olejnik S; Algina J
    Psychol Methods; 2003 Dec; 8(4):434-47. PubMed ID: 14664681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimation of maximal reliability for multiple-component instruments in multilevel designs.
    Raykov T; Penev S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):129-42. PubMed ID: 18001517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Defining and distinguishing validity: interpretations of score meaning and justifications of test use.
    Cizek GJ
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):31-43. PubMed ID: 22268761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Non-linear structural equation models with correlated continuous and discrete data.
    Lee SY; Song XY; Cai JH; So WY; Ma CW; Chan CN
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):327-47. PubMed ID: 18590605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues.
    Hunsley J; Meyer GJ
    Psychol Assess; 2003 Dec; 15(4):446-55. PubMed ID: 14692841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An effect size index for comparing two independent alpha coefficients.
    Liu HY; Weng LJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):385-400. PubMed ID: 18573226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures.
    Collins LM; Schafer JL; Kam CM
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):330-51. PubMed ID: 11778676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method for testing group differences of scale validity in multiple population studies.
    Raykov T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2005 May; 58(Pt 1):173-84. PubMed ID: 15969845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A generalized dimensionality discrepancy measure for dimensionality assessment in multidimensional item response theory.
    Levy R; Svetina D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):208-32. PubMed ID: 21492129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An accumulator model for responses and response times in tests based on the proportional hazards model.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Nov; 67(3):388-407. PubMed ID: 23992122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical approaches to achieving sufficiently high test score reliabilities for research purposes.
    Charter RA
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jul; 135(3):241-51. PubMed ID: 18649491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.