184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19072539)
1. Comparison of MS(2)-only, MSA, and MS(2)/MS(3) methodologies for phosphopeptide identification.
Ulintz PJ; Yocum AK; Bodenmiller B; Aebersold R; Andrews PC; Nesvizhskii AI
J Proteome Res; 2009 Feb; 8(2):887-99. PubMed ID: 19072539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phosphopeptide fragmentation and analysis by mass spectrometry.
Boersema PJ; Mohammed S; Heck AJ
J Mass Spectrom; 2009 Jun; 44(6):861-78. PubMed ID: 19504542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reference-facilitated phosphoproteomics: fast and reliable phosphopeptide validation by microLC-ESI-Q-TOF MS/MS.
Imanishi SY; Kochin V; Ferraris SE; de Thonel A; Pallari HM; Corthals GL; Eriksson JE
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2007 Aug; 6(8):1380-91. PubMed ID: 17510049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Classification filtering strategy to improve the coverage and sensitivity of phosphoproteome analysis.
Jiang X; Ye M; Han G; Dong X; Zou H
Anal Chem; 2010 Jul; 82(14):6168-75. PubMed ID: 20568719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A scoring model for phosphopeptide site localization and its impact on the question of whether to use MSA.
Fischer JSDG; Dos Santos MDM; Marchini FK; Barbosa VC; Carvalho PC; Zanchin NIT
J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():42-50. PubMed ID: 25623781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A neutral loss activation method for improved phosphopeptide sequence analysis by quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry.
Schroeder MJ; Shabanowitz J; Schwartz JC; Hunt DF; Coon JJ
Anal Chem; 2004 Jul; 76(13):3590-8. PubMed ID: 15228329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mining phosphopeptide signals in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry data for protein phosphorylation analysis.
Wu HY; Tseng VS; Liao PC
J Proteome Res; 2007 May; 6(5):1812-21. PubMed ID: 17402769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of high-accuracy precursor masses on phosphopeptide identification from MS3 spectra.
Timm W; Ozlu N; Steen JJ; Steen H
Anal Chem; 2010 May; 82(10):3977-80. PubMed ID: 20426395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating the Efficiency of Phosphopeptide Identification by Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
Hsu CC; Xue L; Arrington JV; Wang P; Paez Paez JS; Zhou Y; Zhu JK; Tao WA
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2017 Jun; 28(6):1127-1135. PubMed ID: 28283928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Colander: a probability-based support vector machine algorithm for automatic screening for CID spectra of phosphopeptides prior to database search.
Lu B; Ruse CI; Yates JR
J Proteome Res; 2008 Aug; 7(8):3628-34. PubMed ID: 18563924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improved titanium dioxide enrichment of phosphopeptides from HeLa cells and high confident phosphopeptide identification by cross-validation of MS/MS and MS/MS/MS spectra.
Yu LR; Zhu Z; Chan KC; Issaq HJ; Dimitrov DS; Veenstra TD
J Proteome Res; 2007 Nov; 6(11):4150-62. PubMed ID: 17924679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sequential abundant ion fragmentation analysis (SAIFA): an alternative approach for phosphopeptide identification using an ion trap mass spectrometer.
Chesnik M; Halligan B; Olivier M; Mirza SP
Anal Biochem; 2011 Nov; 418(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 21855524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated phosphopeptide identification using multiple MS/MS fragmentation modes.
Vandenbogaert M; Hourdel V; Jardin-Mathé O; Bigeard J; Bonhomme L; Legros V; Hirt H; Schwikowski B; Pflieger D
J Proteome Res; 2012 Dec; 11(12):5695-703. PubMed ID: 23094866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automatic validation of phosphopeptide identifications from tandem mass spectra.
Lu B; Ruse C; Xu T; Park SK; Yates J
Anal Chem; 2007 Feb; 79(4):1301-10. PubMed ID: 17297928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of data-dependent and -independent mass spectrometric workflows for sensitive quantification of proteins and phosphorylation sites.
Bauer M; Ahrné E; Baron AP; Glatter T; Fava LL; Santamaria A; Nigg EA; Schmidt A
J Proteome Res; 2014 Dec; 13(12):5973-88. PubMed ID: 25330945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Linear discriminant analysis-based estimation of the false discovery rate for phosphopeptide identifications.
Du X; Yang F; Manes NP; Stenoien DL; Monroe ME; Adkins JN; States DJ; Purvine SO; Camp DG; Smith RD
J Proteome Res; 2008 Jun; 7(6):2195-203. PubMed ID: 18422353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Citrate boosts the performance of phosphopeptide analysis by UPLC-ESI-MS/MS.
Winter D; Seidler J; Ziv Y; Shiloh Y; Lehmann WD
J Proteome Res; 2009 Jan; 8(1):418-24. PubMed ID: 19053530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigating MS2/MS3 matching statistics: a model for coupling consecutive stage mass spectrometry data for increased peptide identification confidence.
Ulintz PJ; Bodenmiller B; Andrews PC; Aebersold R; Nesvizhskii AI
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2008 Jan; 7(1):71-87. PubMed ID: 17872894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Data-dependent modulation of solid-phase extraction capillary electrophoresis for the analysis of complex peptide and phosphopeptide mixtures by tandem mass spectrometry: application to endothelial nitric oxide synthase.
Figeys D; Corthals GL; Gallis B; Goodlett DR; Ducret A; Corson MA; Aebersold R
Anal Chem; 1999 Jul; 71(13):2279-87. PubMed ID: 10405598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic validation of phosphopeptide identifications by the MS2/MS3 target-decoy search strategy.
Jiang X; Han G; Feng S; Jiang X; Ye M; Yao X; Zou H
J Proteome Res; 2008 Apr; 7(4):1640-9. PubMed ID: 18314942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
