These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19072769)

  • 1. A Bayesian sensitivity model for intention-to-treat analysis on binary outcomes with dropouts.
    Kaciroti NA; Schork MA; Raghunathan T; Julius S
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):572-85. PubMed ID: 19072769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity analysis of intention-to-treat estimates when withdrawals are related to unobserved compliance status.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Griffiths K
    Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(8):1164-79. PubMed ID: 17724782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A graphical sensitivity analysis for clinical trials with non-ignorable missing binary outcome.
    Hollis S
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3823-34. PubMed ID: 12483769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Bayesian framework for intent-to-treat analysis with missing data.
    Kleinman KP; Ibrahim JG; Laird NM
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):265-78. PubMed ID: 9544521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sense and sensitivity when correcting for observed exposures in randomized clinical trials.
    Vansteelandt S; Goetghebeur E
    Stat Med; 2005 Jan; 24(2):191-210. PubMed ID: 15515152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blood pressure variability causes spurious identification of hypertension in clinical studies: a computer simulation study.
    Turner MJ; van Schalkwyk JM
    Am J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 21(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 18091749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of intention to treat in analysis of noninferiority studies.
    Wiens BL; Zhao W
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 17715258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian sensitivity analysis of incomplete data: bridging pattern-mixture and selection models.
    Kaciroti NA; Raghunathan T
    Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(27):4841-57. PubMed ID: 25256610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple imputation under Bayesianly smoothed pattern-mixture models for non-ignorable drop-out.
    Demirtas H
    Stat Med; 2005 Aug; 24(15):2345-63. PubMed ID: 15977286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of data analysis strategies for intent-to-treat analysis in pre-test-post-test designs with substantial dropout rates.
    Salim A; Mackinnon A; Christensen H; Griffiths K
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Sep; 160(3):335-45. PubMed ID: 18718673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons of methods for analysis of repeated binary responses with missing data.
    Frank Liu G; Zhan X
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):371-92. PubMed ID: 21442514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Missing data handling in chronic pain trials.
    Kim Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Mar; 21(2):311-25. PubMed ID: 21391004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian analysis of hierarchical pattern-mixture models for clinical trials data with attrition and comparisons to commonly used ad-hoc and model-based approaches.
    Demirtas H
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):383-402. PubMed ID: 15920887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of longitudinal binary data with missing data due to dropouts.
    Ali MW; Talukder E
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(6):993-1007. PubMed ID: 16279357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Preventing hypertension with drugs?].
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Mar; 148(13):4-5. PubMed ID: 16642692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results of a phase III, 8-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial to assess the effects of amlodipine camsylate versus amlodipine besylate in Korean adults with mild to moderate hypertension.
    Kim SH; Kim YD; Lim DS; Yoon MH; Ahn YK; On YK; Lee JW; Kim IJ; Park JB; Kim JJ; Chung WS; Yang JY; Seo HS; Shin EK; Kim HS;
    Clin Ther; 2007 Sep; 29(9):1924-36. PubMed ID: 18035192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A systematic review finds variable use of the intention-to-treat principle in musculoskeletal randomized controlled trials with missing data.
    Joseph R; Sim J; Ogollah R; Lewis M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 25304501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [In high risk patients also treat high normal blood pressure values!].
    Düsing R
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2006 Mar; 148(13):5. PubMed ID: 16642693
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accounting for dropout bias using mixed-effects models.
    Mallinckrodt CH; Clark WS; David SR
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):9-21. PubMed ID: 11459446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian inference for randomized clinical trials with treatment failures.
    Shaffer ML; Chinchilli VM
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1215-28. PubMed ID: 15083479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.