BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19073248)

  • 1. Investigation of surface plasmon resonance biosensor for skin sensitizers studies.
    Achilleos C; Tailhardat M; Courtellemont P; Varlet BL; Dupont D
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Mar; 23(2):308-18. PubMed ID: 19073248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens.
    Gerberick GF; Vassallo JD; Bailey RE; Chaney JG; Morrall SW; Lepoittevin JP
    Toxicol Sci; 2004 Oct; 81(2):332-43. PubMed ID: 15254333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The incorporation of lysine into the peroxidase peptide reactivity assay for skin sensitization assessments.
    Troutman JA; Foertsch LM; Kern PS; Dai HJ; Quijano M; Dobson RL; Lalko JF; Lepoittevin JP; Gerberick GF
    Toxicol Sci; 2011 Aug; 122(2):422-36. PubMed ID: 21555337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: a non-animal approach to skin sensitization.
    Aptula AO; Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Schultz TW
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2006 Mar; 20(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 16112535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of chemical peptide reactivity for screening contact allergens: a classification tree model approach.
    Gerberick GF; Vassallo JD; Foertsch LM; Price BB; Chaney JG; Lepoittevin JP
    Toxicol Sci; 2007 Jun; 97(2):417-27. PubMed ID: 17400584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reactivity profiling: covalent modification of single nucleophile peptides for skin sensitization risk assessment.
    Aleksic M; Thain E; Roger D; Saib O; Davies M; Li J; Aptula A; Zazzeroni R
    Toxicol Sci; 2009 Apr; 108(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19221146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allergic contact dermatitis--formation, structural requirements, and reactivity of skin sensitizers.
    Karlberg AT; Bergström MA; Börje A; Luthman K; Nilsson JL
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Jan; 21(1):53-69. PubMed ID: 18052130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
    Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
    J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compilation of historical local lymph node data for evaluation of skin sensitization alternative methods.
    Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kern PS; Schlatter H; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA
    Dermatitis; 2005 Dec; 16(4):157-202. PubMed ID: 16536334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
    Schneider K; Akkan Z
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of non-covalent protein binding in skin sensitisation potency of chemicals.
    Aleksic M; Thain E; Gutsell SJ; Pease CK; Basketter DA
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 17612982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of reactivity schemes for the prediction skin sensitization potential.
    Patlewicz G; Roberts DW; Uriarte E
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 21(2):521-41. PubMed ID: 18189364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Expression of surface markers on the human monocytic leukaemia cell line, THP-1, as indicators for the sensitizing potential of chemicals.
    An S; Kim S; Huh Y; Lee TR; Kim HK; Park KL; Eun HC
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Apr; 60(4):185-92. PubMed ID: 19338585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
    Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
    Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):293-301. PubMed ID: 18058304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of IL-18 production in a human keratinocyte cell line to discriminate contact sensitizers from irritants and low molecular weight respiratory allergens.
    Corsini E; Mitjans M; Galbiati V; Lucchi L; Galli CL; Marinovich M
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Aug; 23(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 19397996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of contact allergens by dissociation of irritant and sensitizing properties.
    Jacobs JJ; Lehé CL; Cammans KD; Das PK; Elliott GR
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2004 Oct; 18(5):681-90. PubMed ID: 15251187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does irritation potency contribute to the skin sensitization potency of contact allergens?
    Basketter DA; Kan-King-Yu D; Dierkes P; Jowsey IR
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2007; 26(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 18058302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Filling the concept with data: integrating data from different in vitro and in silico assays on skin sensitizers to explore the battery approach for animal-free skin sensitization testing.
    Natsch A; Emter R; Ellis G
    Toxicol Sci; 2009 Jan; 107(1):106-21. PubMed ID: 18832184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hapten-protein binding: from theory to practical application in the in vitro prediction of skin sensitization.
    Divkovic M; Pease CK; Gerberick GF; Basketter DA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Oct; 53(4):189-200. PubMed ID: 16191014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.