These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19074758)

  • 1. How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.
    Thorpe C; Ryan B; McLean SL; Burt A; Stewart M; Brown JB; Reid GJ; Harris S
    Fam Pract; 2009 Feb; 26(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 19074758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive.
    Delnevo CD; Abatemarco DJ; Steinberg MB
    Am J Prev Med; 2004 Apr; 26(3):234-6. PubMed ID: 15026104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Encouraging physicians to respond to surveys through the use of fax technology.
    Lensing SY; Gillaspy SR; Simpson PM; Jones SM; James JM
    Eval Health Prof; 2000 Sep; 23(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 11067195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Physicians' attitudes toward and knowledge of the pulmonary artery catheter: Society of Critical Care Medicine membership survey.
    Trottier SJ; Taylor RW
    New Horiz; 1997 Aug; 5(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 9259331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. E-mail or snail mail? Randomized controlled trial on which works better for surveys.
    Seguin R; Godwin M; MacDonald S; McCall M
    Can Fam Physician; 2004 Mar; 50():414-9. PubMed ID: 15318679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates.
    Robertson J; Walkom EJ; McGettigan P
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Aug; 14(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 15937989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Health care system reform. Ontario family physicians' reactions.
    Cohen M; Ferrier B; Woodward CA; Brown J
    Can Fam Physician; 2001 Sep; 47():1777-84. PubMed ID: 11570303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized trial of $20 versus $50 incentives to increase physician survey response rates.
    Keating NL; Zaslavsky AM; Goldstein J; West DW; Ayanian JZ
    Med Care; 2008 Aug; 46(8):878-81. PubMed ID: 18665068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating telephone follow-up of a mail survey of community pharmacies.
    Westrick SC; Mount JK
    Res Social Adm Pharm; 2007 Jun; 3(2):160-82. PubMed ID: 17561218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Use of incentives to enhance response rates in questionnaire surveys].
    Tjerbo T; Kvaerner KJ; Botten G; Aasland OG
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Sep; 125(18):2496-7. PubMed ID: 16186870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of various methodologic strategies: survey response rates among Canadian physicians and physicians-in-training.
    Grava-Gubins I; Scott S
    Can Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 54(10):1424-30. PubMed ID: 18854472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sentinel physician networks as a technique for rapid immunization policy surveys.
    Crane LA; Daley MF; Barrow J; Babbel C; Stokley S; Dickinson LM; Beaty BL; Steiner JF; Kempe A
    Eval Health Prof; 2008 Mar; 31(1):43-64. PubMed ID: 18184632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can you use a sequential sample of patients as a substitute for a full practice audit?: Study of mammography screening rates in 20 family practices in Ontario.
    Swanson G; Kaczorowski J
    Can Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 54(10):1436-7, 1437.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18854475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Issues in survey data on medical practice: some empirical comparisons.
    Greenwald HP; Hart LG
    Public Health Rep; 1986; 101(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 3094087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survey response rates to a professional association mail questionnaire.
    Camuñas C; Alward RR; Vecchione E
    J N Y State Nurses Assoc; 1990 Sep; 21(3):7-9. PubMed ID: 2213259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of an e-mail database of US intensive care physicians.
    Halpern SD; Hussen SA; Metkus TS; Ward NS; Luce JM; Curtis JR
    J Crit Care; 2007 Mar; 22(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 17371741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prepayment was superior to postpayment cash incentives in a randomized postal survey among physicians.
    Leung GM; Johnston JM; Saing H; Tin KY; Wong IO; Ho LM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Aug; 57(8):777-84. PubMed ID: 15485729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survey methodology for the uninitiated.
    Wall CR; DeHaven MJ; Oeffinger KC
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Jun; 51(6):573. PubMed ID: 12100785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000-2010: a review.
    McLeod CC; Klabunde CN; Willis GB; Stark D
    Eval Health Prof; 2013 Mar; 36(1):106-26. PubMed ID: 23378504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Caring for cancer survivors: a survey of primary care physicians.
    Bober SL; Recklitis CJ; Campbell EG; Park ER; Kutner JS; Najita JS; Diller L
    Cancer; 2009 Sep; 115(18 Suppl):4409-18. PubMed ID: 19731354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.