These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19076127)

  • 1. Cultural circumcision in EU public hospitals--an ethical discussion.
    Brusa M; Barilan YM
    Bioethics; 2009 Oct; 23(8):470-82. PubMed ID: 19076127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Religious circumcision, invasive rites, neutrality and equality: bearing the burdens and consequences of belief.
    Johnson MT
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 39(7):450-5. PubMed ID: 23698888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Female genital circumcision: medical and cultural considerations.
    Little CM
    J Cult Divers; 2003; 10(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 12776545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rethinking circumcision: medical intervention, religious ceremony, or genital mutilation?
    Legato MJ
    J Gend Specif Med; 2002; 5(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 12192887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Between Moral Relativism and Moral Hypocrisy: Reframing the Debate on "FGM".
    Earp BD
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2016 Jun; 26(2):105-44. PubMed ID: 27477191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The child's interests and the case for the permissibility of male infant circumcision.
    Mazor J
    J Med Ethics; 2013 Jul; 39(7):421-8. PubMed ID: 23698892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ritual male infant circumcision and human rights.
    Jacobs AJ; Arora KS
    Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(2):30-9. PubMed ID: 25674955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Between prophylaxis and child abuse: the ethics of neonatal male circumcision.
    Benatar M; Benatar D
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):35-48. PubMed ID: 12859815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Circumcision revisited.
    Kessel R
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(2):4; author reply 5. PubMed ID: 9131342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Female circumcision.
    Abu Daia JM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):921-3. PubMed ID: 11369952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cultural bias in responses to male and female genital surgeries.
    Davis DS
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):W5. PubMed ID: 12859796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judging the other. Responding to traditional female genital surgeries.
    Lane SD; Rubinstein RA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(3):31-40. PubMed ID: 8736673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Genital mutilation of women. A new challenge for the health service].
    Sundby J; Austveg B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 Sep; 113(21):2704-7. PubMed ID: 8266295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forced genital cutting in North America: feminist theory and nursing considerations.
    Antinuk K
    Nurs Ethics; 2013 Sep; 20(6):723-8. PubMed ID: 24030105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Moral Hypocrisy or Intellectual Inconsistency?: A Historical Perspective on Our Habit of Placing Male and Female Genital Cutting in Separate Ethical Boxes.
    Darby R
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2016 Jun; 26(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 27477193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The effect of circumcision on the mental health of children: a review].
    Yavuz M; Demir T; Doğangün B
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2012; 23(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 22374633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Male neonatal circumcision: ritual or public-health imperative.
    Batzer FR; Hurwitz JM
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):W10. PubMed ID: 12859801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relativists and Hypocrites: Earp on Genital Cutting.
    Nelson JL
    Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2016 Jun; 26(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 27477194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The synergistic relationship between health and human rights: a case study using female genital mutilation.
    Moore K; Randolph K; Toubia N; Kirberger E
    Health Hum Rights; 1997; 2(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 10381834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Male circumcision, religious preferences, and the question of harm.
    Sheldon M
    Am J Bioeth; 2003; 3(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 12859823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.