512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19076142)
1. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.
Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy.
Müntener M; Epstein JI; Hernandez DJ; Gonzalgo ML; Mangold L; Humphreys E; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Nielsen ME
Eur Urol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):767-75; discussion 775-6. PubMed ID: 18060681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies.
Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between upgrading of prostate biopsy and biochemical failure and unfavorable pathology after radical prostatectomy.
Ozden C; Oztekin CV; Ugurlu O; Gokkaya S; Yaris M; Memis A
Urol Int; 2009; 83(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 19752607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice.
Zareba P; Zhang J; Yilmaz A; Trpkov K
Histopathology; 2009 Oct; 55(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 19817888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer by three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy.
Numao N; Kawakami S; Yokoyama M; Yonese J; Arisawa C; Ishikawa Y; Ando M; Fukui I; Kihara K
Eur Urol; 2007 Dec; 52(6):1663-8. PubMed ID: 17240041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years.
Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading System in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Trpkov K; Zhang J
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):722-3. PubMed ID: 19689580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle biopsies or radical prostatectomy specimens: contemporary approach, current clinical significance and sources of pathology discrepancies.
Montironi R; Mazzuccheli R; Scarpelli M; Lopez-Beltran A; Fellegara G; Algaba F
BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(8):1146-52. PubMed ID: 15877724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading?
Smith EB; Frierson HF; Mills SE; Boyd JC; Theodorescu D
Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2282-7. PubMed ID: 12001128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression?
Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M
BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percentages of positive cores, cancer length and Gleason grade 4/5 cancer in systematic sextant biopsy are all predictive of adverse pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.
Suekane S; Noguchi M; Nakashima O; Yamada S; Kojiro M; Matsuoka K
Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 17681061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the biopsy Gleason score important in predicting outcomes for patients after radical prostatectomy once the pathological Gleason score is known?
Vira MA; Guzzo T; Heitjan DF; Tomaszewski JE; D'Amico A; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB
BJU Int; 2008 May; 101(10):1232-6. PubMed ID: 18419697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of biochemical relapse-free survival between primary Gleason score 3 and primary Gleason score 4 for biopsy Gleason score 7 prostate cancer.
Burdick MJ; Reddy CA; Ulchaker J; Angermeier K; Altman A; Chehade N; Mahadevan A; Kupelian PA; Klein EA; Ciezki JP
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1439-45. PubMed ID: 18963536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oncological control after radical prostatectomy in men with clinical T3 prostate cancer: a single-centre experience.
Xylinas E; Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Vaessen C; Renard-Penna R; Misrai V; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Richard F; Cussenot O; Roupret M
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1173-8; discussion 1178. PubMed ID: 19040530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
