These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
514 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19076142)
1. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade. Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic significance of Gleason score discrepancies between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy. Müntener M; Epstein JI; Hernandez DJ; Gonzalgo ML; Mangold L; Humphreys E; Walsh PC; Partin AW; Nielsen ME Eur Urol; 2008 Apr; 53(4):767-75; discussion 775-6. PubMed ID: 18060681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of the 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus conference on standard Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in needle biopsies. Billis A; Guimaraes MS; Freitas LL; Meirelles L; Magna LA; Ferreira U J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):548-52; discussion 552-3. PubMed ID: 18550106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation between upgrading of prostate biopsy and biochemical failure and unfavorable pathology after radical prostatectomy. Ozden C; Oztekin CV; Ugurlu O; Gokkaya S; Yaris M; Memis A Urol Int; 2009; 83(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 19752607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus on Gleason grading in contemporary practice. Zareba P; Zhang J; Yilmaz A; Trpkov K Histopathology; 2009 Oct; 55(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 19817888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved accuracy in predicting the presence of Gleason pattern 4/5 prostate cancer by three-dimensional 26-core systematic biopsy. Numao N; Kawakami S; Yokoyama M; Yonese J; Arisawa C; Ishikawa Y; Ando M; Fukui I; Kihara K Eur Urol; 2007 Dec; 52(6):1663-8. PubMed ID: 17240041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer. Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores. Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years. Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading System in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Trpkov K; Zhang J BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):722-3. PubMed ID: 19689580 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle biopsies or radical prostatectomy specimens: contemporary approach, current clinical significance and sources of pathology discrepancies. Montironi R; Mazzuccheli R; Scarpelli M; Lopez-Beltran A; Fellegara G; Algaba F BJU Int; 2005 Jun; 95(8):1146-52. PubMed ID: 15877724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gleason scores of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens over the past 10 years: is there evidence for systematic upgrading? Smith EB; Frierson HF; Mills SE; Boyd JC; Theodorescu D Cancer; 2002 Apr; 94(8):2282-7. PubMed ID: 12001128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: do they have an impact on biochemical or clinical progression? Pfitzenmaier J; Pahernik S; Tremmel T; Haferkamp A; Buse S; Hohenfellner M BJU Int; 2008 Nov; 102(10):1413-8. PubMed ID: 18537951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Percentages of positive cores, cancer length and Gleason grade 4/5 cancer in systematic sextant biopsy are all predictive of adverse pathology and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy. Suekane S; Noguchi M; Nakashima O; Yamada S; Kojiro M; Matsuoka K Int J Urol; 2007 Aug; 14(8):713-8. PubMed ID: 17681061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens. Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the biopsy Gleason score important in predicting outcomes for patients after radical prostatectomy once the pathological Gleason score is known? Vira MA; Guzzo T; Heitjan DF; Tomaszewski JE; D'Amico A; Wein AJ; Malkowicz SB BJU Int; 2008 May; 101(10):1232-6. PubMed ID: 18419697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of biochemical relapse-free survival between primary Gleason score 3 and primary Gleason score 4 for biopsy Gleason score 7 prostate cancer. Burdick MJ; Reddy CA; Ulchaker J; Angermeier K; Altman A; Chehade N; Mahadevan A; Kupelian PA; Klein EA; Ciezki JP Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1439-45. PubMed ID: 18963536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Oncological control after radical prostatectomy in men with clinical T3 prostate cancer: a single-centre experience. Xylinas E; Drouin SJ; Comperat E; Vaessen C; Renard-Penna R; Misrai V; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Richard F; Cussenot O; Roupret M BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1173-8; discussion 1178. PubMed ID: 19040530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]