150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19076180)
1. The precision of fit of milled titanium implant frameworks (I-Bridge) in the edentulous jaw.
Eliasson A; Wennerberg A; Johansson A; Ortorp A; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):81-90. PubMed ID: 19076180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precision of CNC-milled titanium frameworks for implant treatment in the edentulous jaw.
Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 10635187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
Al-Fadda SA; Zarb GA; Finer Y
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 17455431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
Eliasson A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (197):3-95. PubMed ID: 18652085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible.
Ortorp A; Jemt T; Bäck T; Jälevik T
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 12737254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Photogrammetry--an alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study.
Jemt T; Bäck T; Petersson A
Int J Prosthodont; 1999; 12(4):363-8. PubMed ID: 10635208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of fit of CNC-milled titanium and zirconia frameworks to implants.
Abduo J; Lyons K; Waddell N; Bennani V; Swain M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e20-9. PubMed ID: 21414138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between "virtual" and "physical" assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements.
Jemt T; Hjalmarsson L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e175-82. PubMed ID: 22171700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. On titanium frameworks and alternative impression techniques in implant dentistry.
Ortorp A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (169):3-88. PubMed ID: 15709359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On cobalt-chrome frameworks in implant dentistry.
Hjalmarsson L
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2009; (201):3-83. PubMed ID: 20143574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Parameters of passive fit using a new technique to mill implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study of a novel three-dimensional force measurement-misfit method.
Tahmaseb A; van de Weijden JJ; Mercelis P; De Clerck R; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 20369082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Precision of fit to implants: a comparison of Cresco™ and Procera® implant bridge frameworks.
Hjalmarsson L; Örtorp A; Smedberg JI; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 12(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 19438959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fit of implant frameworks: an in vitro comparison between two fabrication techniques.
Takahashi T; Gunne J
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):256-60. PubMed ID: 12644800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. CNC-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: a 10-year comparative clinical study.
Örtorp A; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 19686283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discrepancy of complete-arch titanium frameworks manufactured using selective laser melting and electron beam melting additive manufacturing technologies.
Revilla-León M; Ceballos L; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):942-947. PubMed ID: 30006219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simplified method to assess precision of fit between framework and supporting implants: a preliminary study.
Calderini A; Maiorana C; Garlini G; Abbondanza T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):831-8. PubMed ID: 17974120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Early laser-welded titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous mandible: a 15-year comparative follow-up study.
Ortorp A; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):311-22. PubMed ID: 18783415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients.
Friberg B; Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Mar; 10(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 18254740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of vertical misfit of titanium and zirconia frameworks on peri-implant strain.
Abduo J; Swain M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):529-36. PubMed ID: 22616045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the marginal precision of one-piece complete arch titanium frameworks fabricated using five different methods for implant-supported restorations.
Torsello F; di Torresanto VM; Ercoli C; Cordaro L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):772-9. PubMed ID: 18720557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
