These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19076180)

  • 41. Accuracy of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw: analysis of precision of fit between cast gold-alloy frameworks and master casts by means of a three-dimensional photogrammetric technique.
    Jemt T; Lie A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1995 Sep; 6(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 7578793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparison of strains produced in a bone simulant between conventional cast and resin-luted implant frameworks.
    Clelland NL; van Putten MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 9425760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Description and evaluation of a simplified method to achieve passive fit between cast titanium frameworks and implants.
    Helldén LB; Dérand T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 9581404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
    Garine WN; Funkenbusch PD; Ercoli C; Wodenscheck J; Murphy WC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):928-38. PubMed ID: 18271374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of implant design on preservation of marginal bone in the mandible.
    Van de Velde T; Collaert B; Sennerby L; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Jun; 12(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 19220843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Three-dimensional distortion of gold alloy castings and welded titanium frameworks. Measurements of the precision of fit between completed implant prostheses and the master casts in routine edentulous situations.
    Jemt T
    J Oral Rehabil; 1995 Aug; 22(8):557-64. PubMed ID: 7472725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Outcome of Brånemark Novum implant treatment in edentulous mandibles: a retrospective 5-year follow-up study.
    Gualini F; Gualini G; Cominelli R; Lekholm U
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 18783416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The effect of commercially pure titanium and alternative dental alloys on the marginal fit of one-piece cast implant frameworks.
    de Torres EM; Rodrigues RC; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    J Dent; 2007 Oct; 35(10):800-5. PubMed ID: 17825466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. CAD/CAM fabrication accuracy of long- vs. short-span implant-supported FDPs.
    Katsoulis J; Müller P; Mericske-Stern R; Blatz MB
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015 Mar; 26(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 25363301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dimensional accuracy analysis of implant framework castings from 2 casting systems.
    Chang TL; Maruyama C; White SN; Son S; Caputo AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):720-5. PubMed ID: 16274145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: changes in component fit over time.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):346-51. PubMed ID: 12690346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Vertical marginal gap evaluation of conventional cast and computer numeric controlled-milled titanium full-arch implant-supported frameworks.
    Alfadda SA
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(6):517-22. PubMed ID: 25390864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. In vitro vertical misfit evaluation of cast frameworks for cement-retained implant-supported partial prostheses.
    Oyagüe RC; Turrión AS; Toledano M; Monticelli F; Osorio R
    J Dent; 2009 Jan; 37(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18951675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. In vitro investigation of marginal accuracy of implant-supported screw-retained partial dentures.
    Koke U; Wolf A; Lenz P; Gilde H
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 May; 31(5):477-82. PubMed ID: 15140174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Evaluation of a new method to achieve optimal passivity of implant-supported superstructures.
    Goossens IC; Herbst D
    SADJ; 2003 Aug; 58(7):279-85, 287. PubMed ID: 14649041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of gold-machined UCLA-type abutments and CAD/CAM titanium abutments with hexagonal external connection and with internal connection.
    Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 18548920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cyclic loading of implant-supported prostheses: comparison of gaps at the prosthetic-abutment interface when cycled abutments are replaced with as-manufactured abutments.
    Hecker DM; Eckert SE; Choi YG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jan; 95(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 16399272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
    Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dimensional accuracy and retentive strength of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis.
    Randi AP; Hsu AT; Verga A; Kim JJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(4):547-56. PubMed ID: 11516002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.