These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19076244)
21. Finite element analysis of effect of prosthesis height, angle of force application, and implant offset on supporting bone. Sütpideler M; Eckert SE; Zobitz M; An KN Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):819-25. PubMed ID: 15623056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/supported overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Liu J; Pan S; Dong J; Mo Z; Fan Y; Feng H J Dent; 2013 Mar; 41(3):241-9. PubMed ID: 23160036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A complete finite element model of a mandibular implant-retained overdenture with two implants: comparison between rigid and resilient attachment configurations. Daas M; Dubois G; Bonnet AS; Lipinski P; Rignon-Bret C Med Eng Phys; 2008 Mar; 30(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 17383925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis. Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers. Akça K; Akkocaoglu M; Cömert A; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 17340903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Finite element analysis of 2 immediate loading systems in edentulous mandible: rigid and semirigid splinting of implants. Teixeira MF; Ramalho SA; de Mattias Sartori IA; Lehmann RB Implant Dent; 2010 Feb; 19(1):39-49. PubMed ID: 20147815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures. Närhi TO; Geertman ME; Hevinga M; Abdo H; Kalk W J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 10898841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of bone insertion level of support teeth in class I mandibular removable partial denture associated with an osseointegrated implant: a study using finite element analysis. Verri FR; Pellizzer EP; Pereira JA; Zuim PR; Santiago Júnior JF Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):192-201. PubMed ID: 21613946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of stress distribution in overdenture-retaining bar with different levels of vertical misfit. Spazzin AO; Abreu RT; Noritomi PY; Consani RL; Mesquita MF J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):280-5. PubMed ID: 21658152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis. Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stress analysis at bone-implant interface of single- and two-implant-retained mandibular overdenture using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Lahoti K; Pathrabe A; Gade J Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 28169256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of implant distribution on the biomechanical behaviors of mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Liao X; Cao R; Zhong J; Chen C; Pan S BMC Oral Health; 2024 Mar; 24(1):405. PubMed ID: 38555452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The influence of bar design (round versus milled bar) on prosthodontic maintenance of mandibular overdentures supported by 4 implants: a 5-year prospective study. Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 19149069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Stress analysis in simulation models with or without implant threads representation. Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; de Sousa EA Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1040-4. PubMed ID: 20162107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Stress analysis in edentulous mandibular bone supporting implant-retained 1-piece or multiple superstructures. Yokoyama S; Wakabayashi N; Shiota M; Ohyama T Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(4):578-83. PubMed ID: 16161742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of thickness and area of reline on the stress distribution in peri-implant bone during the healing period: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. dos Santos MB; Bacchi A; Consani RL; Mesquita MF Gen Dent; 2012; 60(4):e231-6. PubMed ID: 22782057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Complete overdenture retained with implants and bar-clip attachments]. Zhao Y; Liu B; Ma X Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Nov; 17(4):338-40. PubMed ID: 12539380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Finite element stress analysis of cuneiform and cylindrical threaded implant geometries. Cruz M; Lourenço AF; Toledo EM; da Silva Barra LP; de Castro Lemonge AC; Wassall T Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):421-38. PubMed ID: 17065763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nonlinear finite element analysis versus ex vivo strain gauge measurements on immediately loaded implants. Eser A; Akça K; Eckert S; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 19587865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]