These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19076480)

  • 1. Spacing effects in learning: a temporal ridgeline of optimal retention.
    Cepeda NJ; Vul E; Rohrer D; Wixted JT; Pashler H
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1095-102. PubMed ID: 19076480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of retention interval length on young and elderly adults' memory for spatial information.
    Rutledge PC; Hancock RA; Walker L
    Exp Aging Res; 1997; 23(2):163-77. PubMed ID: 9151076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diminished but not forgotten: effects of aging on magnitude of spacing effect benefits.
    Simone PM; Bell MC; Cepeda NJ
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2013 Sep; 68(5):674-80. PubMed ID: 23103383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing distributed practice: theoretical analysis and practical implications.
    Cepeda NJ; Coburn N; Rohrer D; Wixted JT; Mozer MC; Pashler H
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(4):236-46. PubMed ID: 19439395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spacing of repetitions improves learning and memory after moderate and severe TBI.
    Hillary FG; Schultheis MT; Challis BH; Millis SR; Carnevale GJ; Galshi T; DeLuca J
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Feb; 25(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 12607171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Influence of attention on an auditory-verbal learning test in schizophrenic patients].
    Huguelet P; Nicastro R; Zanello A
    Encephale; 2002; 28(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 12232538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning from feedback: Spacing and the delay-retention effect.
    Smith TA; Kimball DR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jan; 36(1):80-95. PubMed ID: 20053046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lack of spacing effects during piano learning.
    Wiseheart M; D'Souza AA; Chae J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182986. PubMed ID: 28800631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inter-session delay and its effects on performance and retention of spatial learning on a radial maze with mice.
    Roullet P
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 1995 Jul; 64(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 7582811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults.
    Logan JM; Balota DA
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2008 May; 15(3):257-80. PubMed ID: 18421627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extended retention intervals can help to bridge the gap between subjective and objective memory impairment.
    Witt JA; Glöckner C; Helmstaedter C
    Seizure; 2012 Mar; 21(2):134-40. PubMed ID: 22119172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanisms underlying the spacing effect in learning: A comparison of three computational models.
    Walsh MM; Gluck KA; Gunzelmann G; Jastrzembski T; Krusmark M; Myung JI; Pitt MA; Zhou R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Sep; 147(9):1325-1348. PubMed ID: 30148385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of interference and retention delay on temporal generalization performance.
    Rattat AC; Droit-Volet S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1903-12. PubMed ID: 20952787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal memory and content memory for actions: adult age differences in acquisition and retention.
    Kausler DH; Wiley JG
    Exp Aging Res; 1990; 16(3):147-50. PubMed ID: 2090466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The long-term retention of time: a developmental study.
    Rattat AC; Droit-Volet S
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 16095044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relearning attenuates the benefits and costs of spacing.
    Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1113-29. PubMed ID: 23088488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Children's memory for complex autobiographical events: does spacing of repeated instances matter?
    Price HL; Connolly DA; Gordon HM
    Memory; 2006 Nov; 14(8):977-89. PubMed ID: 17077032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The identity model and factors controlling the superiority of the study-test method over the anticipation method.
    Izawa C
    J Gen Psychol; 1985 Jan; 112(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 3998714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intervening tasks and visuospatial memory: the role of similarity in retroactive interference.
    Morra LF; Garcon SM; Lucas ME; Donovick PJ
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2013; 27(5):818-26. PubMed ID: 23697810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maximizing students' retention via spaced review: practical guidance from computational models of memory.
    Khajah MM; Lindsey RV; Mozer MC
    Top Cogn Sci; 2014 Jan; 6(1):157-69. PubMed ID: 24482341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.