263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19076939)
1. Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology.
Parks J
Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 19076939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protecting embryos and burdening women: assisted reproduction in Italy.
Robertson JA
Hum Reprod; 2004 Aug; 19(8):1693-6. PubMed ID: 15229207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Choosing substantive justice: a discussion of "choice," "rights" and the new reproductive technologies.
Cherry AL
Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 11(3):431-41. PubMed ID: 16281338
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Rich discussion about reproductive autonomy.
McLeod C
Bioethics; 2009 Jan; 23(1):ii-iii. PubMed ID: 19076936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Hannah Arendt, feminist theorizing, and the debate over new reproductive technologies.
Curtis KF
Polity; 1995; 28(2):159-87. PubMed ID: 11655203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The limits of compromise: the range of perspectives on women's reproductive rights in Poland.
Paprzycka E; Dec-Pietrowska J; Lech M
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Apr; 24(2):117-123. PubMed ID: 30730216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Degendering reproduction?
Jackson E
Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(3):346-68. PubMed ID: 18695265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Rethinking progenitive conflict: why reproductive autonomy matters.
Priaulx N
Med Law Rev; 2008; 16(2):169-200. PubMed ID: 18413356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom.
Arellano Mde J
Med Law Rev; 2010; 18(3):427-33. PubMed ID: 20739439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
Reilly EA
Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Disputes over frozen preembryos and the "right not to be a parent".
Pachman TS
Columbia J Gend Law; 2003; 12(1):128-53. PubMed ID: 16281330
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion rights judgment: a ray of hope!
Johari V; Jadhav U
Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):180-183. PubMed ID: 28279947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reproductive freedom and women's freedom: surrogacy and autonomy.
Sistare CT
Philos Forum; 1988; 19(4):227-40. PubMed ID: 16100825
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Feminism and reproductive technologies.
Callahan JC
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 11644539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproductive Rights or Reproductive Justice? Lessons from Argentina.
Morgan L
Health Hum Rights; 2015 Jun; 17(1):E136-47. PubMed ID: 26204578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Brazilian women in politics.
Sanders TG
UFSI Rep; 1987; (14):1-8. PubMed ID: 12315429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ICMR guidelines on assisted reproductive technology: lacking in vision, wrapped in red tape.
Murthy L; Subramanian V
Indian J Med Ethics; 2007; 4(3):123-4. PubMed ID: 18624141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Female genital mutilation or cutting: an updated medico-legal analysis.
Mathews B; Dallaston E
Med J Aust; 2020 Oct; 213(7):309-311.e1. PubMed ID: 32924148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Democrats vow to strengthen Medicare and Medicaid and preserve women's health rights.
Tanne JH
BMJ; 2012 Sep; 345():e6103. PubMed ID: 22963950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and human rights.
Shaw D
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Oct; 24(5):633-46. PubMed ID: 20303830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
